1976
DOI: 10.1086/226225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Social Distance, Occupational Stratification, and Forms of Status and Class Consciousness: A Cross-national Replication and Extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Laumann and Senter's (1976) comparative study of America and Germany, concerning subjective social distance, showed that competitive status consciousness was pervasive in both American and German communities, especially at the lower status levels. People at the lower status levels subjectively assimilate themselves with others at the higher statuses, driven by ''prestige-seeking orientation'' (Laumann & Senter, 1976, p. 1313. Consuming styles of higher status can be seen as a major effort for the assimilation.…”
Section: Theory and Model Of Assimilation-distinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Laumann and Senter's (1976) comparative study of America and Germany, concerning subjective social distance, showed that competitive status consciousness was pervasive in both American and German communities, especially at the lower status levels. People at the lower status levels subjectively assimilate themselves with others at the higher statuses, driven by ''prestige-seeking orientation'' (Laumann & Senter, 1976, p. 1313. Consuming styles of higher status can be seen as a major effort for the assimilation.…”
Section: Theory and Model Of Assimilation-distinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, R a > R d can be a reasonable constraint to (3). Given the strong competitive status consciousness from lower status (Laumann & Senter, 1976) and the mass-marketing of cultural goods to the public in contemporary consumer society, people from most status groups share similar information on what higher status people are supposed to consume. By contrast, people do not care much about lower statuses' tastes unless these are becoming more alike their own.…”
Section: Status-closure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential convergence exists between occupational consciousness and other sociological concepts associated with social inequity and systems of stratification, particularly those grounded on Marxian and Weberian thought, such as class and status consciousness; “the subjective awareness of class or status location and the implications of such awareness for social action” (Laumann & Senter, 1976, p. 1307). It is not so much in the notion of class or status location – the conception of which has been problematized in sociology (Marshall, 1997; Wright, 1979) – that potential synergy lies, but the formulation of consciousness as an emotional and psychic response to social stratification; always in interaction with the makings and consequences of such stratification (Reay, 2005).…”
Section: Underpinning Theoretical and Philosophical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, individuals with 482 Journal of Health and Social Behavior 52 (4) higher objective social status have greater ability to attract social contacts. People perceive highstatus individuals as possessing more valuable resources (Thye 2000) and prefer to interact closely with those of higher status than those of comparable status (Laumann and Senter 1976;Thye 2000). Furthermore, as the principle of homophily predicts, individuals with higher achieved positions tend to socialize with others with similar achievements.…”
Section: Social Capital and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%