Subjective Social Mobility among Migrant Children in China

Abstract

Little scholarly attention has been paid to the relationship between children’s subjective social mobility and their “social ecology”. Children’s subjective social mobility is about how they perceive their future social position compared to their parents’. Social ecology refers to the influential multi-layered surrounding factors, including family, school, and community. We analyzed data from structured questionnaires completed by 2221 migrant children (1296 boys and 925 girls, with a mean age of 11.7 years) from three private schools in Guangzhou and Foshan, China. The findings indicate that participants anticipated a significant improvement in their future social status. Of the factors influencing this belief, community integration has the most significant impact (TE = 0.246), followed by school integration (TE = 0.220) and family socioeconomic status (TE = 0.053). We also found that children’s self-concept plays a role in their perceptions of social mobility. Based on the study results, we propose recommendations to provide migrant children additional protection and enhance their living environment.

Social mobility and perinatal depression in Black women

“…Three primary frameworks have emerged in life course epidemiology that elucidate how duration, changes, and timing of SEP impacts health across time (49,50): (1) critical period framework posits that SEP in early life influences health later via sensitive developmental periods; (2) risk accumulation framework suggests that the impact of SEP is cumulative over time to impact health; and (3) more recently, social mobility framework proposes that upward or downward change in SEP between life stages influences health (51). That is, improved social mobility may improve health outcomes by decreasing risk or prolonged exposure to adverse exposures over the life course, and upward mobility may compensate for early adverse life exposures.…”