Subjective valuation of tangible and intangible heritage neighbourhood attributes

Bonet, Lidia E.; Greene, Margarita; Ortúzar, Juan de Dios

doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102249

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Firstly, nearly everyonecitizen, scholar, writer, professional, or organisationhas a slightly different conception of typologies and attributes related to them. 44 Secondly, selecting several ones among complex and diverse values of built heritage, giving them priorities over others, can lead to conflicts of cultivating certain values at the expense of others. 45 Considering the complexity of the heritage value, experts generally use purposely vague and malleable definitions of the concept.…”

Section: Admitting Holistic Values Of Architectural/ Urban/ Landscape Designingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Process-led value elicitation within built heritage management: a systematic literature review between 2010 and 2020

Chen

2021

Journal of Architectural Conservation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The UNESCO 2011 Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) states community participation is an essential tool to elicit values attributed by diverse stakeholders in built heritage, to better prioritise actions based on public interests and needs. Traditional value elicitation often takes place in an expert-driven process following value typology frameworks, which is, however, widely criticised under the self-examination and reflection within built heritage protection and management. Therefore, it is still not adequately explored how values of built heritage can be identified through a process-led methodology of inclusive public participation. Using the method of a systematic literature review, this paper collected and analysed documents published between 2010 and 2020, from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. The findings show that process-led value elicitation has been widely discussed and applied within the international practices of built heritage management, as five main themes are synthesised in this paper. This review could be inspiring and pioneering in the field of international built heritage management, pushing methodological changes to focus more on the use and significance of heritage in local residents and their living experiences.

show abstract

Section: Admitting Holistic Values Of Architectural/ Urban/ Landscape Designingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Process-led value elicitation within built heritage management: a systematic literature review between 2010 and 2020

Chen

2021

Journal of Architectural Conservation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a relatively comprehensive category of intangible cultural heritage in China, the folklore intangible cultural heritage (FICH) is mainly expressed by folkloric activities which contain several items including traditional festivals [10,11], living customs, production practices, folk beliefs, life rituals and folk costumes [12,13]. These activities were held by the people of a particular region as commemorative celebration for ancestor worship, festival celebrations, harvest celebrations and live entertainment [6,14]. FICH embodies the iconic local culture and is passed on with the group as the primary bearer in a specific cultural field [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Presentation and Elaboration of the Folk Intangible Cultural Heritage from the Perspective of the Landscape

Zhuang

Wan²,

Zheng³

2022

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The folklore of intangible cultural heritage (FICH) is mainly expressed in folkloric activities, which include traditional festivals, living customs, production practices, folk beliefs, life rituals and folk costumes. The more reasonable and efficient ways to achieve conservation and transmission of FICH have become an urgent problem to be solved. Landscape presentation offers a potential method to address that by excavating the landscape characteristics of FICH based on its in-depth connotation and development history. This study aims to explore the cultural connotation of the FICH and extract the elements of landscape design, thus presenting and expressing the FICH using landscape as a carrier, to achieve the conservation and inheritance of the FICH. This research took the Taishun Hundred-family Feast culture, one of FICH in Sankui Town, Taishun County, China, as the study case, and extracted the landscape design elements in FICH after its content excavation and conducted presentation with cultural objectification, landscape narrative and contextualization. The results showed that the Hundred-family Feast culture contains rich landscape genes which can be divided into the ritual culture, food culture, festival culture and spiritual culture. Some of the elements in the Hundred-family Feast culture in terms of patterns, forms and colours for the content of activities, material carriers and spiritual places were also extracted for the landscape presentation. According to the different types and places of the Hundred-family Feast culture activities, the centre of Sankui Town is divided into four landscape thematic areas, namely the Hundred-family Feast cultural entrance experience zone, the food culture experience zone, ritual culture experience zone, and activity performance experience zone. The landscape element and spatial carriers were designed and illustrated for conserving and recovering the Hundred-family Feast culture, respectively. This study innovatively analyses the FICH from the perspective of the characteristics and constituent elements of the landscape and establishes a more reasonable framework system for the method of landscape presentation of the FICH in a structured and comprehensive manner. It enriches the theoretical system of intangible cultural heritage protection and its inheritance via landscape presentation methods for folklore activities.

show abstract

Monitoring and Assessment Heritage Tool: Quantify and classify urban heritage buildings

Ornelas

Sousa²,

Guedes

et al. 2023

Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Subjective valuation of tangible and intangible heritage neighbourhood attributes

Cited by 4 publications

References 24 publications

Process-led value elicitation within built heritage management: a systematic literature review between 2010 and 2020

Process-led value elicitation within built heritage management: a systematic literature review between 2010 and 2020

Presentation and Elaboration of the Folk Intangible Cultural Heritage from the Perspective of the Landscape

Monitoring and Assessment Heritage Tool: Quantify and classify urban heritage buildings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About