2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Workload Assessment Technique (SWAT) in Real Time: Affordable Methodology to Continuously Assess Human Operators’ Workload

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the “noisy” signal of the measured grip force (as illustrated in Figure 4 ) may interfere with the analysis of the state of the driver. Therefore, other data processing methods (e.g., fast Fourier transform) should be considered if real-time assessment is required ( Zak et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the “noisy” signal of the measured grip force (as illustrated in Figure 4 ) may interfere with the analysis of the state of the driver. Therefore, other data processing methods (e.g., fast Fourier transform) should be considered if real-time assessment is required ( Zak et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then he was asked to perform the preliminary task to acquire a perception of the cognitive workload, as required by the SWAT technique ( Reid et al, 1988 ). Once completed, the participant went through the workload setup phase, where he had to complete the missions of the first scenario while continuously answering, every 10–30 seconds, the SWAT questionnaire regarding his current perceived workload ( Reid & Nygren, 1988 ; Zak et al, 2020e ). The C2 map during the setup phase did not include a filter and showed all information items.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw data collected via the UCES included the time (in milliseconds), the current stage, the filter protocol, the number of items shown on the map, and the joystick’s state on its two axes. Cognitive workload was derived from the joystick’s state using the ML-based SWAT-RT technique ( Zak et al, 2020e ). Since each participant may experience workload differently, the scores’ scale differs among participants.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantifying the level of cognitive workload in real-time has real-world applications across several domains, such as preventing distracted driving [ 3 ], rating pilots’ performance [ 4 ] and providing individualized return-to-learn guidelines following mild traumatic brain injury [ 5 ]. Though questionnaire surveys and observation of human behavior can be used to estimate cognitive workload, such estimates are subjective (hence, subject to bias) and are not available on a continuous, real-time basis [ 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%