1996
DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sublexical Orthographic–Phonological Relations Early in the Acquisition of Reading: The Knowledge Sources Account

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the Knowledge Sources theory that was developed to include different sources of knowledge to account for the acquisition of word reading in a tradition of text-centered teaching as well as a tradition with explicit phonics (Thompson et al, 1996; Fletcher-Flinn and Thompson, 2004; Thompson and Fletcher-Flinn, 2006, 2012). In this theory, as soon as the child, with support from parent or teacher, has acquired reliable reading of a few words, and has attended to “the relationship in which letters of words often match sound units of the spoken word” (Thompson and Fletcher-Flinn, 2012, p. 254), they can independently extract from their emerging reading vocabulary some letter-sound information coded with sublexical features.…”
Section: What Accounts For This Failure In Application?supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with the Knowledge Sources theory that was developed to include different sources of knowledge to account for the acquisition of word reading in a tradition of text-centered teaching as well as a tradition with explicit phonics (Thompson et al, 1996; Fletcher-Flinn and Thompson, 2004; Thompson and Fletcher-Flinn, 2006, 2012). In this theory, as soon as the child, with support from parent or teacher, has acquired reliable reading of a few words, and has attended to “the relationship in which letters of words often match sound units of the spoken word” (Thompson and Fletcher-Flinn, 2012, p. 254), they can independently extract from their emerging reading vocabulary some letter-sound information coded with sublexical features.…”
Section: What Accounts For This Failure In Application?supporting
confidence: 83%
“…They gave no segmented pronunciation of component letters, contrary to what would be expected in an explicit phonics response. Moreover, a replication of the task was conducted, and also confirmation by a successful prediction of positive effects (relative to controls) on pseudoword reading accuracy from experimental training that introduced words with final b into the children's reading vocabularies (Thompson et al, 1996). For children receiving explicit phonics instruction there has not been a complete replication involving the training experiment.…”
Section: What Accounts For This Failure In Application?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Systematic instruction on alphabetic principles should be based on students' knowledge of sight words and certain level oral language proficiency (Thompson et al, 1996).…”
Section: Conceptualization Of Reading and The Underlying Phonologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When children in their 1st year at school who had received explicit phonics instruction attempted to read new words (nonwords), they used graphemephoneme correspondences without sensitivity to conditional influences of the position of the correspondences in words (Fletcher-Flinn, Shankweiler, & Frost, 2004). On the other hand, children without explicit phonics showed sensitivity to conditional influences of the position that the correspondences occupied in words in their reading vocabulary (Thompson, Cottrell, & Fletcher-Flinn, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%