1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-0633(99)00037-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sublimation coefficient of water ice under simulated cometary-like conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gundlach et al (2011) updated this empirical relation using the results of experiments conducted with mixtures of water ice and a dust component consisting of silica spheres. These results agree well with those reported by Kossacki et al (1999) for temperatures below 195 K and above 230 K, but show some discrepancies in between, in particular, with a faster decrease of the sublimation coefficient as temperature increases.…”
Section: Insights From Laboratory Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gundlach et al (2011) updated this empirical relation using the results of experiments conducted with mixtures of water ice and a dust component consisting of silica spheres. These results agree well with those reported by Kossacki et al (1999) for temperatures below 195 K and above 230 K, but show some discrepancies in between, in particular, with a faster decrease of the sublimation coefficient as temperature increases.…”
Section: Insights From Laboratory Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The so-called sublimation coefficient of water ice describes the difference between measurements and theory and can be used as a correction coefficient, for example, to correctly model the temperature at the surface of a sublimating comet nucleus. Kossacki et al (1999) proposed an empirical temperature dependence of the sublimation coefficient of pure water ice over the temperature range of 170-270 K, based on three different experimental datasets. The sublimation coefficient is close to 1 for temperatures lower than 195 K, decreases as the temperature increases from 195 K to 230 K, and then remains at a constant value of about 0.15 for higher temperatures.…”
Section: Insights From Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high value of the extrapolated surface temperature is an additional argument for this assumption. As shown by Kossacki et al (1999) a decrease of the effective sublimation coefficient leads to a visible growth of temperature (for a fixed insolation flux) and at the same time to a very small increase of the gas flux.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We have addressed this question in a recent paper (Kossacki et al 1999). In the current paper, however, we keep the classical assumption α s = α c = 1, in order to avoid confusion of too many different effects.…”
Section: Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the parameters applied here are the same as in the papers by Davidsson and Skorov (2002b) and Skorov et al (2002). Note that the porous character of the medium is taken into account phenomenologically by introducing into the heat-conductivity formula the so-called Hertz factor h , which characterizes the contact area between particles in a porous medium and takes values from 1 to 0.001 in different calculations (Kossacki et al , 1999):…”
Section: The Model Of Heat and Mass Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%