Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli

Abstract

Emotions have a profound influence on aesthetic experiences. Studies using affective priming procedures demonstrate, for example, that inducing a conscious negative emotional state biases the perception of abstract stimuli towards the sublime (Eskine et al. Emotion 12:1071-1074, 2012. doi: 10.1037/a0027200). Moreover, subliminal happy facial expressions have a positive impact on the aesthetic evaluation of abstract art (Flexas et al. PLoS ONE 8:e80154, 2013). Little is known about how emotion influences aesthetic perception of non-abstract, representational stimuli, especially those that are particularly relevant for social behaviour, like human bodies. Here, we explore whether the subliminal presentation of emotionally charged visual primes modulates the explicit subjective aesthetic judgment of body images. Using a forward/backward masking procedure, we presented subliminally positive and negative, arousal-matched, emotional or neutral primes and measured their effect on the explicit evaluation of perceived beauty (high vs low) and emotion (positive vs negative) evoked by abstract and body images. We found that negative primes increased subjective aesthetic evaluations of target bodies or abstract images in comparison with positive primes. No influence of primes on the emotional dimension of the targets was found, thus ruling out an unspecific arousal effect and strengthening the link between emotional valence and aesthetic appreciation. More specifically, that subliminal negative primes increase beauty ratings compared to subliminal positive primes indicates a clear link between negative emotions and positive aesthetic evaluations and vice versa, suggesting a possible link between negative emotion and the experience of sublime in art. The study expands previous research by showing the effect of subliminal negative emotions on the subjective aesthetic evaluation not only of abstract but also of body images.

How the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Controls Affective Processing in Absence of Visual Awareness – Insights From a Combined EEG-rTMS Study

“…Subsequently, offline cTBS was administered on rDLPFC or vertex, the Active Control region, before participants viewed the Post-cTBS presentation accompanied by EEG recordings. Upon completion, participants again filled the CAS and then performed five behavioral tasks in the following order: facial expression identification, facial gender identification ( Nitsche et al, 2012 ; Zwanzger et al, 2014 ; Conson et al, 2015 ), valence and arousal evaluation of images ( Feeser et al, 2014 ; Zwanzger et al, 2014 ; Balconi and Cobelli, 2015 ; Era et al, 2015 ), and detection and discrimination visual awareness tasks ( Liddell et al, 2004 ; Williams et al, 2004 ). After conclusion of the experiment, participants were thoroughly debriefed and received contact details of the experimenter, supervisor, ethics committee, and university counseling services.…”

The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study

“…Even static stimuli with a high dynamic content might induce the stimulation of a movement in the observer 7,57 . This embodied experience or this embodied simulation plays an important role in enhancing the aesthetic evaluation of art works through a mechanism of personal involvement in the work itself 49,56,58,59 . Aesthetic preference would be enhanced when action priming is congruent with the artist's painting style 60 .…”

Neuroscience of aesthetics

“…Recently, Era and colleagues measured the effects of subliminally presented positive, negative, and neutral primes on beauty and emotion judgments involving abstract and body images . Interestingly, they found that, in comparison with positive primes, negative primes increased subjective aesthetic evaluations of both types of target images.…”