2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-020-01510-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submarine landslides on a carbonate platform slope: forward numerical modelling of mechanical stratigraphy and scenarios of failure precondition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the carbonate margin, the hydraulic conductivity distribution in Figure 4b is similar to the permeability distribution modeled for the Great Bahamas Bank by Busson et al. (2021). We do not have information on groundwater distribution on the platform, but on the slope the modeled salinity distribution in Figure 6e matches salinity measurements in boreholes from ODP Expedition 166.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the carbonate margin, the hydraulic conductivity distribution in Figure 4b is similar to the permeability distribution modeled for the Great Bahamas Bank by Busson et al. (2021). We do not have information on groundwater distribution on the platform, but on the slope the modeled salinity distribution in Figure 6e matches salinity measurements in boreholes from ODP Expedition 166.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The models use a single permeability value for each facies, and, being 2D, do not take into account variability in shore‐parallel sediment and flow regimes. They also ignore cementation, although this was shown to have a second‐order influence on the pore fluid pressure regime and instability in carbonate settings (Busson et al., 2021). The critical yield strength changes with depth, but we have ignored this effect in the slope stability models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the amphitheatre‐shaped scarps on the south Al Wajh slope did not evolve into gullies or smaller canyons as a result of retrogressive erosion driven by shallow‐water sediment export from the platform top, as observed for the slope at the Great Barrier Reef (Webster et al ., 2012; Puga‐Bernabéu et al ., 2013) and Little Bahama Bank (Tournadour et al ., 2017). Typically, sea‐level fluctuations, sediment influx from shallow water (Wunsch et al ., 2017) and a steepening stratigraphic trend (Busson et al ., 2021) are mechanisms controlling slope failures. However, the non‐retrogressive trend combined with the other observations suggests tectonic processes triggering slope failures on the southern Al Wajh slope.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Spence and Tucker (1997) highlighted the importance of pore-water overpressure of confined aquifer horizons associated with karstification beneath the seafloor as the dominant factor of destabilization during sea-level falls. This process was also proposed in the modelling study of Busson et al (2021) to explain the occurrence of platform margin collapses and associated MTD deposits, marking the western margin of GBB during sea-level falls. The pore-water overpressure scenario and associated platform margin sediment overloading were confirmed through the analysis of the debris-flow facies constituents by Reijmer et al (2012Reijmer et al ( , 2015aReijmer et al ( , 2015b, which explained the occurrence of debris-flow deposits at glacial to interglacial and interglacial to glacial transitions for Exuma Sound.…”
Section: The Mis 5 Eventmentioning
confidence: 91%