2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submarine power cable between Europe and North America: A techno-economic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent work investigated a potential 3,300 km link by 2030 between Europe (UK) and North America (Canada) with a carrying capacity of 4,000 MW at ±640 kV. The authors concluded that the cost of such ambitious investment could be justified by the associated social benefits and the project high energy exchange potential [223].…”
Section: Res Interconnection Horizonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent work investigated a potential 3,300 km link by 2030 between Europe (UK) and North America (Canada) with a carrying capacity of 4,000 MW at ±640 kV. The authors concluded that the cost of such ambitious investment could be justified by the associated social benefits and the project high energy exchange potential [223].…”
Section: Res Interconnection Horizonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interconnecting both regions is additionally discussed in various recent research articles, highlighting the vast energy utilization prospects that could be realized through an operational DC grid [223,227]. Relevant to this, the authors of [228] present a potential roadmap for such African-European interconnection using HVDC to transmit dispatchable Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) power to Europe through Italy and Spain on the medium-term as the main connection points from Africa to support a future supergrid implementation.…”
Section: Res Interconnection Horizonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation technologies considered include wind, solar, hydro, biomass, combined heatpower, nuclear, hard coal, lignite, gas, and oil power plants (In TYNDP 2016, some technologies are aggregated under the names "others-RES" and "others non-RES". According to [51,52] others-RES is mainly biomass while others non-RES is combined heat power plants. CHP is considered as nondispatchable at our study.).…”
Section: Description Of the Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is developed for 2020 and 2025 scenarios following the European Network of Transmission System Operators (ENTSO-E) Mid-term Adequacy Forecast (MAF) 2016 [21]. The model [22] comprises of (i) 32 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Germany, United Kingdom (which is modelled as two different regions: Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland, modelled as 33 nodes), and (ii) the cross-border transmission connections between these nodes. The modelled nodes and their cross-border connections are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%