2013
DOI: 10.11650/tjm.17.2013.2332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submaximal Integral Domains

Abstract: It is proved that if D is a U F D and R is a D-algebra, such that U (R) ∩ D = U (D), then R has a maximal subring. In particular, if R is a ring which either contains a unit x which is not algebraic over the prime subring of R, or R has zero characteristic and there exists a natural number n > 1 such that 1 n ∈ R, then R has a maximal subring. It is shown that if R is a reduced ring with |R| > 2 2 ℵ 0 or J(R) = 0, then any R-algebra has a maximal subring. Residually finite rings without maximal subrings are fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, if R is a ring and x is a unit in R which is not algebraic over the prime subring of R, then R has a maximal subring S which does not contain x −1 . Consequently, if R is a nonsubmaximal ring, then U R and therefore J R are algebraic over the prime subring of R. Using the previous result in [4], it is proved that every uncountable UFD is submaximal.…”
Section: Preliminaries On Maximal Subringsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, if R is a ring and x is a unit in R which is not algebraic over the prime subring of R, then R has a maximal subring S which does not contain x −1 . Consequently, if R is a nonsubmaximal ring, then U R and therefore J R are algebraic over the prime subring of R. Using the previous result in [4], it is proved that every uncountable UFD is submaximal.…”
Section: Preliminaries On Maximal Subringsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Consequently, every reduced ring R with R > 2 2 ℵ 0 or J R = 0 is submaximal. Finally, in [4], the following useful result is proved. The previous theorem has several interesting consequences.…”
Section: Preliminaries On Maximal Subringsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A proper subring S of a ring R is called a maximal subring if S is maximal with respect to inclusion in the set of all proper subrings of R. Not every ring possesses maximal subrings (for example the algebraic closure of a finite field has no maximal subrings, see [14,Corollary 2.7] or [7,Remark 1.13]; also see [6,Example 2.6] and [9,Example3.19] for more examples of rings which have no maximal subrings). A ring which possesses a maximal subring is said to be submaximal, see [3], [7] and [9]. If S is a maximal subring of a ring R, then the extension S ⊆ R is called a minimal ring extension (see [21]) or an adjacent extension too (see [16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%