2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submental island flap - should we be worried about lymph node transfer? An anatomical and histological study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the lymph node metastasis in level I made it controversial to employ facial-artery-based regional flaps in oncologic defect reconstruction (18,19). Strict limitation to the cN 0 patients and pedicle skeletonization were suggested in previous studies (18,20,22,23), but occult metastasis was still present in 34%-45% of cN 0 necks (19, 24,25), and 25% of the skeletonized flap pedicles were histologically confirmed to contain lymph nodes (26). To overcome this difficulty, contralateral facial-artery-based nasolabial flap and submental island flap were introduced in recent years (27,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lymph node metastasis in level I made it controversial to employ facial-artery-based regional flaps in oncologic defect reconstruction (18,19). Strict limitation to the cN 0 patients and pedicle skeletonization were suggested in previous studies (18,20,22,23), but occult metastasis was still present in 34%-45% of cN 0 necks (19, 24,25), and 25% of the skeletonized flap pedicles were histologically confirmed to contain lymph nodes (26). To overcome this difficulty, contralateral facial-artery-based nasolabial flap and submental island flap were introduced in recent years (27,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%