1964
DOI: 10.1021/ac60212a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submicromicrogram Determination of Cyanide by a Polarographic Method.

Abstract: the results of the present work. The observed exchange currents at platinum electrodes in iodide-iodine solutions are much greater than the apparent rate of electron exchange between adsorbed iodine (or iodide) and dissolved iodine (or iodide) (24). Our results indicate that I2 adsorbs extensively on an iodidecovered surface so that a reaction such as 2 need not be involved. (The present work does not distinguish between I2 or I as the adsorbed entity.) In addition, if the sites, S, are assumed to be the same … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrochemical methods for cyanide determination include amperometry (3)(4)(5) and polarography (6). Sulfide can be determined by cathodic stripping voltammetry (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemical methods for cyanide determination include amperometry (3)(4)(5) and polarography (6). Sulfide can be determined by cathodic stripping voltammetry (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cyanide ion when small samples, less than 50 ml, are available. Electrochemical methods have been used to determine low concentrations of cyanide ion, but they do not appear to offer any advantages over the photometric methods (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 2 and 3 show typical waves of cadmium chloride and zinc chloride obtainable at very low concentrations. Preliminary work on the amperometric determination of extremely small concentrations (10-10 to 10~10 gram) of hydrogen cyanide (10) has shown that this instrument exceeds the sensitivity of those reported in the literature (1,8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%