1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)56509-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suboptimality analysis of receding horizon predictive control with terminal constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gurobi or CPLEX) may fail to find that optimal solution due to rounding errors and built-in tolerances [27]. Moreover, the receding horizon formulation of Problem 3, introduced for the sake of computational tractability, results in suboptimality [36], [37]. Due to these factors, no strong theoretical guarantee can be given regarding the optimality of the MILP stage.…”
Section: ) Collision Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gurobi or CPLEX) may fail to find that optimal solution due to rounding errors and built-in tolerances [27]. Moreover, the receding horizon formulation of Problem 3, introduced for the sake of computational tractability, results in suboptimality [36], [37]. Due to these factors, no strong theoretical guarantee can be given regarding the optimality of the MILP stage.…”
Section: ) Collision Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%