1966
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-66-03340-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subordinate Hp functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first equality is the definition of the H p norm, so we only have to prove the second. If g ∈ H p and f ∈ ᐁ 0 then by a result of Ryff [1966], g • f ∈ H p with smaller or equal norm. Thus |g| p is positive, continuous function on the disk which has nontangential boundary values almost everywhere, so Lemma 5.1 shows that…”
Section: A Change Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first equality is the definition of the H p norm, so we only have to prove the second. If g ∈ H p and f ∈ ᐁ 0 then by a result of Ryff [1966], g • f ∈ H p with smaller or equal norm. Thus |g| p is positive, continuous function on the disk which has nontangential boundary values almost everywhere, so Lemma 5.1 shows that…”
Section: A Change Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Fo W/FoB e H' by the proof of Theorem 4, then Woy/(FoWoy/)/(FoBoy/) e Hx'2 by [12]. Thus Roy/ is in Hl/2, and since it is positive almost everywhere on /, then it can be extended analytically across I [7, pp.…”
Section: Properties Of Certain Hp Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is in L2(-oo, oo). We note that by a theorem of Ryff [6], F(x) = F(x + ¿0) is the boundary function of F(z). This justifies the notation, but logically it is not needed here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%