Subordinates' Resistance and Managers' Evaluations of Subordinates' Performance

Tepper, Bennett J.; Uhl‐Bien, Mary; Kohut, Gary F.; Rogelberg, Steven G.; Lockhart, Daniel E.; Ensley, Michael D.

doi:10.1177/0149206305277801

Cited by 62 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, one might consider whether sampling in a single organization (or small sample of organizations) would give one the variability needed without using a student-recruited sample. One could argue that for certain rare constructs or situations, a student-recruited sample is necessary to obtain enough variability (e.g., abusive supervision in Tepper et al, 2006). Regardless of the justification, such rationale should be provided in the paper.…”

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Student‐recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research

Wheeler

Shanine

Leon

et al. 2013

J Occupat & Organ Psyc

274

212

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Student‐recruited sampling, a technique involving the use of student recruiters to find participants on behalf of a researcher, has been increasingly used in organizational research; yet there has been little attempt to understand its implications for the conclusions scholars draw from research. In this study, we meta‐analyse studies of engagement and perceptions of politics in order to examine whether student‐recruited sampling leads to samples that differ from other samples and whether those differences result in different observed relationships between variables. We found that student‐recruited samples were not substantively demographically different from non‐student‐recruited samples. Further, we found few differences in the observed correlations of student‐recruited samples compared with non‐student‐recruited samples; the differences found would not lead to different practical conclusions from the findings. We discuss the implications of these results for future studies and provide guidance for researchers, reviewers, and editors regarding the use of student‐recruited samples in organizational research. Practitioner points The type of sample used can lead to over‐ or under‐representation of demographic characteristics with the sample, which has unknown affects on analyses of data. Student‐recruited samples may lead to smaller effect sizes of observed statistical relationships.

show abstract

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Student‐recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research

Wheeler

Shanine

Leon

et al. 2013

J Occupat & Organ Psyc

274

212

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a further consequence, lower dysfunctional employee resistance and higher constructive employee resistance should be positively related to employee performance and satisfaction. Although a number of correlates of employee resistance have been identified (Tepper et al, 2001), the dependent variable of employee performance has not received substantial empirical attention within this emerging literature (Tepper et al, 2006).…”

Section: Employee Resistance As a Mediating Mechanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure

Vecchio

Justin

Pearce

2010

The Leadership Quarterly

270

268

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Tepper et al (2006) noted that leaders were likely to view the same constructive negotiation attempts very differently based on their relationship with the follower in question. Tepper et al noted that leaders were receptive to negotiation with followers that they had a close work and social relationship with, but tended to view the same strategy negatively from followers who did not fit into this category.…”

Section: Followership Styles and Behaviorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Followership in the School Context

Cruickshank¹

2017

OJL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focused on investigating the leader-follower relationship to determine the influence that effective followers have in regards to the success or failure of their leader within the school context. Just as a teacher needs to be informed as to the needs and abilities of their students, a leader needs to possess similar knowledge in regards to their followers. Followers have traditionally been neglected in leadership research and seen as simply passive recipients of leadership. Leadership and followership represent two sides of one dynamic relationship; without followers, there can be no leaders. This means that followers' behaviors are a vital component of the leadership process, and that leadership cannot be fully understood without an understanding of followership. This paper will examine these follower behaviors and the influence that they can have on school leadership.

show abstract

Subordinates' Resistance and Managers' Evaluations of Subordinates' Performance

Abstract: The authors thank Ed Miles for comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this research. This article was accepted under the editorship of Daniel Feldman.

Cited by 62 publications

References 51 publications

Student‐recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research

Student‐recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research

Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure

Followership in the School Context

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About