2021
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.7.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subretinal Saline Protects the Neuroretina From Thermic Damage During Laser Induction of Experimental Choroidal Neovascularization in Pigs

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop a porcine model for photocoagulation induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with high success rate and minimal thermic damage to the neuroretina. Methods Experimental CNV was induced by laser photocoagulation in both eyes of 16 domestic pigs. In the left eyes, photocoagulation was preceded by subretinal injection of saline to protect the neuroretina from thermic damage, whereas the right eyes were treated with photoco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As emphasized by Ryan in 1979, 28 the laser-induced animal model of CNV in rhesus monkeys resembles an acute, traumatic-inflammatory process with substantial neuroretinal damage rather than a chronic, progressive, age-related degeneration. 29 , 30 Such biological differences between the model and modeled disease warrant cautious extrapolation of, for example, evidence of inflammatory processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As emphasized by Ryan in 1979, 28 the laser-induced animal model of CNV in rhesus monkeys resembles an acute, traumatic-inflammatory process with substantial neuroretinal damage rather than a chronic, progressive, age-related degeneration. 29 , 30 Such biological differences between the model and modeled disease warrant cautious extrapolation of, for example, evidence of inflammatory processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FI and OCT images at baseline revealed normal retinas for all animals with discrete variations of retinal pigmentation observed among the experimental animals similar to our previous study. 40 However, from D14 and onwards most eyes injected with scAAV2.8/GFP displayed pigmentary changes on FI (D14 = 43%; D28 = 80%; D42 = 100% of the eyes) ( Figures 5 A and 5B). Additional observations on OCT scans included the loss of distinct layering of the RPE/PR complex (D14 = 29%; D28 = 100%; D42 = 100% of the eyes), hyperreflective irregularities adjacent to the RPE (D28 = 80%; D42 = 100% of the eyes), and a single case (P1, OS, D14) of sparse cells in the vitreous body ( Figures 4 B, 5 A, 5B, and S5 ; Table S1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For this purpose the construct was packaged in a serotype 8 capsid with a single-stranded genome configuration (ssAAV2.8/13-12) and tested in a porcine laser-induced CNV model. 40 To increase efficacy and to account for a potentially weaker transgene expression by the VMD2 promotor compared with the CMV promotor 42 a slightly higher dose (3 × 10 10 vg/eye) than in the delivery study was chosen. On D0, 10 animals received a subretinal injection of ssAAV2.8/13-12 in one eye and an irrelevant, non-targeting control (ssAAV2.8/S1-S2) in the other eye ( Figure 6 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations