1994
DOI: 10.1190/1.1437009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsalt imaging via target‐oriented 3-D prestack depth migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice sub-salt imaging in the Gulf of Mexico is relatively simple, since the velocity of the salt (constant) and of the clastic sediments (a linear function, V = V o + k x Z, where Z is depth) are well known. The model building task involves the definition of the complex shape of the allochtonous salt body (Ratcliff et al, 1994) within a relatively undeformed post-rift Neogene sedimentary pile (Figure 5). New approaches in the Gulf of Mexico include the use of Shear Waves, converted at the salt interface (PSS Waves), to image the sub-salt geometry from three-component geophones lying on the sea floor (Kendall et al, 1998).…”
Section: Time Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice sub-salt imaging in the Gulf of Mexico is relatively simple, since the velocity of the salt (constant) and of the clastic sediments (a linear function, V = V o + k x Z, where Z is depth) are well known. The model building task involves the definition of the complex shape of the allochtonous salt body (Ratcliff et al, 1994) within a relatively undeformed post-rift Neogene sedimentary pile (Figure 5). New approaches in the Gulf of Mexico include the use of Shear Waves, converted at the salt interface (PSS Waves), to image the sub-salt geometry from three-component geophones lying on the sea floor (Kendall et al, 1998).…”
Section: Time Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, since these wave algorithms involve Fourier transforms of the input data and/or the finite‐difference solution of the wave equation, they can handle only regularly spaced input data. On the other hand, the Kirchhoff integral method can easily accommodate an irregular data geometry, and can image subsurface structures of any dip, including turned waves (Ratcliff, Gray and Whitmore 1992; Ratcliff, Jacewitz and Gray 1994). Although 3D wave‐equation‐based migration algorithms have existed for many years, 3D Kirchhoff depth migration is still the most popular, flexible, and cost‐effective method for imaging of subsurface structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many standard methods, which work well in weak-contrast media, often fail in strong-contrast media. Ray-based Kirchhoff migration is the most commonly used method for 3-D prestack depth migration due to its high efficiency and flexibility in handling 3-D prestack data geometry (Ratcliff et al, 1994;Audebert et al, 1997). Migration accuracy of this approach, however, relies on the high-frequency asymptotic ray approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%