2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3557957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsampled Factor Models for Asset Pricing: The Rise of Vasa

Abstract: We propose a new method, VASA, based on variable subsample aggregation of model predictions for equity returns using a large-dimensional set of factors. To demonstrate the effectiveness, robustness, and dimension reduction power of VASA, we perform a comparative analysis between state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. As a performance measure, we explore not only the global predictive but also the stock-specific R 2 's and their distribution. While the global R 2 indicates the average forecasting accurac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, their sample universe contains a wide variety of different companies, from potentially short-living micro-stocks, up to well-established large stocks. The difference in performance between clas-sical models and sophisticated machine learning methods is even smaller when using stock-specific models, and focusing only on long-living companies; see De Nard et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, their sample universe contains a wide variety of different companies, from potentially short-living micro-stocks, up to well-established large stocks. The difference in performance between clas-sical models and sophisticated machine learning methods is even smaller when using stock-specific models, and focusing only on long-living companies; see De Nard et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, their sample universe contains a wide variety of different companies, from potentially short-living micro-stocks, up to well-established large stocks. The difference in performance between classical models and sophisticated machine learning methods is even smaller when using stock-specific models, and focusing only on long-living companies; see De Nard et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%