Chronic exposure to b-agonists causes tolerance to their bronchodilator effects, which is best demonstrated during acute bronchoconstriction. The aim of the present study was to assess whether tolerance becomes more evident with increasing bronchoconstriction, as might occur in acute asthma.In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study comprising 15 patients, the treatments were salbutamol 400 mg q.i.d. or placebo given via Diskhaler1 for 28 days with a 2-week washout between treatments. Patients attended on days 14, 21 and 28. Bronchoconstriction was induced on two of these three occasions to achieve a reduction in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 0 (no methacholine), 15 and 30% (using methacholine) in a randomised order. Immediately after this, salbutamol 100 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg was inhaled at 0, 5, and 10 min. FEV1 was measured over 40 min. Dose/response curves were plotted and values for the area under the curve (AUC)0-40 FEV1 were compared between treatments and by degree of bronchoconstriction.Regular salbutamol resulted in attenuation of the acute response to b-agonist, which was increasingly evident with greater bronchoconstriction. With a reduction in FEV1 of 0, 15 and 30%, the AUC0-40 FEV1 with salbutamol were 11.2, -14.6 and -35.7% respectively, compared to placebo. There was a linear relationship between the magnitude of bronchoconstriction and the between-treatment differences in AUC0-40 FEV1.Increasing bronchoconstriction conferred greater susceptibility to the effects of bronchodilator tolerance. b-agonists are widely prescribed for symptomatic relief in asthma. They are very effective as bronchodilators and as functional antagonists against a wide range of constricting stimuli. However, chronic exposure of b-adrenoceptors (b-AR) to b-agonist drugs leads to reduced responsiveness (desensitisation) and a decrease in the number of receptors (downregulation) [1].In the clinical setting, tolerance to the nonbronchodilator effects of b-agonists is readily demonstrated [2,3]. However, it has been more difficult to demonstrate tolerance to their bronchodilator effects. Reduced bronchodilator response after regular short-and long-acting b-agonists has been reported [4][5][6][7] but the findings have been inconsistent [8][9][10][11]. A possible explanation for these negative results is that bronchodilator responses were measured in patients with stable asthma in whom the margin from baseline to maximum bronchodilatation was not sufficient for the effects of tolerance to be detected.Recently, HANCOX et al. [12] have described a method that reliably demonstrates bronchodilator tolerance to b-agonists. In that study, a 36% reduction in the area under the curve (AUC) for forced expiratory volume (FEV1) was observed in patients who had been using regular inhaled b-agonist compared to placebo. Subsequently, other authors have used the same methodology to show similar effects in patients using long-acting b-agonists [13,14]. In both of these studies, measuring...