2016
DOI: 10.2475/08.2016.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsidence control on river morphology and grain size in the Ganga Plain

Abstract: The Ganga Plain represents a large proportion of the current foreland basin to the Himalaya. The Himalayan-sourced waters irrigate the Plain via major river networks that support approximately 10% of the global population. However, some of these rivers are also the source of devastating floods. The tendency for some of these rivers to flood is directly linked to their large scale morphology. In general, the rivers that drain the east Ganga Plain have channels that are perched at a higher elevation relative to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the water velocity distribution in the section, we hypothesize that the law of the wall applied to the whole water column (details in Appendix A), so that Q()H=Xlb()HXrb()H0zb()xuxzHnormaldxnormaldzgXlb()HXrb()H0zB()xSe()HzB(),xHκln()30zBxHzksnormaldxnormaldz, where u ( x , z , H ) is the water velocity at lateral position x , depth z , and height H ; X lb and X rb respectively represent the left and right bank abscissa; S e ( H ), the energy slope for water elevation H ; g , the gravity constant; κ , the Von Karman constant taken at 0.41; z B ( x , H ), the local bottom depth counted from the water surface; and k s , the effective roughness height here defined by 3 × D 50 = 0.22 m from the pebble median size measured on local Narayani gravel bars (supporting information Table S2; Attal & Lavé, ; Dingle et al, ; Mezaki & Yabiku, ). In equation , S e ( H ), is assumed to be constant around 0.05% (see justification and sensitivity test in supporting information S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To estimate the water velocity distribution in the section, we hypothesize that the law of the wall applied to the whole water column (details in Appendix A), so that Q()H=Xlb()HXrb()H0zb()xuxzHnormaldxnormaldzgXlb()HXrb()H0zB()xSe()HzB(),xHκln()30zBxHzksnormaldxnormaldz, where u ( x , z , H ) is the water velocity at lateral position x , depth z , and height H ; X lb and X rb respectively represent the left and right bank abscissa; S e ( H ), the energy slope for water elevation H ; g , the gravity constant; κ , the Von Karman constant taken at 0.41; z B ( x , H ), the local bottom depth counted from the water surface; and k s , the effective roughness height here defined by 3 × D 50 = 0.22 m from the pebble median size measured on local Narayani gravel bars (supporting information Table S2; Attal & Lavé, ; Dingle et al, ; Mezaki & Yabiku, ). In equation , S e ( H ), is assumed to be constant around 0.05% (see justification and sensitivity test in supporting information S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where u (x,z,H) is the water velocity at lateral position x, depth z, and height H; X lb and X rb respectively represent the left and right bank abscissa; S e (H), the energy slope for water elevation H; g, the gravity constant; κ, Table S2; Attal & Lavé, 2006;Dingle et al, 2016;Mezaki & Yabiku, 1984). In equation (2), S e (H), is assumed to be constant around 0.05% (see justification and sensitivity test in supporting information S7).…”
Section: Sediment Flux Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the western Ganges basin, rivers such as the Sutlej and the Yamuna flow in incised valleys that are deeply entrenched in abandoned alluvial plains (Fig. 10) 52, 80, 81 , and form regionally extensive sediment routing corridors. We suggest that confinement to incised valleys reduced the propensity for these rivers to frequently re-route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size distribution of gravel was characterised from the point of counting of 200 clasts from two photographs; where 100 clasts were sampled from each photograph using an equally spaced grid (spacing ca. 200 mm) to systematically selected clasts (c.f., Attal & Lavé, ; Dingle, Sinclair, Attal, Milodowski, & Singh, ; Whittaker et al, ). To account for the greater volumetric significance of larger clasts on the bed, we counted clasts that cover n grid nodes n times in line with Kellerhals and Bray () and previous publications in this field (D'Arcy et al, ; Whittaker et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%