2021
DOI: 10.1002/stc.2760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subspace‐based Mahalanobis damage detection robust to changes in excitation covariance

Abstract: Summary In the context of detecting changes in structural systems, several vibration‐based damage detection methods have been proposed and successfully applied to both mechanical and civil structures over the past years. These methods involve computing data‐based features, which are then evaluated in statistical tests to detect damages. While being sensitive to damages, the data‐based features are affected by changes in the ambient excitation properties that potentially lead to false alarms in the statistical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…modal parameters [42,43] or features that are formed based on the subspace properties of output covariance Hankel matrices [36,37,44,45]. Some features from the literature [46][47][48] are even robust to changes in environmental conditions.…”
Section: Damage-sensitive Residualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…modal parameters [42,43] or features that are formed based on the subspace properties of output covariance Hankel matrices [36,37,44,45]. Some features from the literature [46][47][48] are even robust to changes in environmental conditions.…”
Section: Damage-sensitive Residualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike techniques based on subspace identification from output-only data 5,33 , this method does not rely on a complete identification of the system at hand -but only on counting the number of degrees of freedom and on monitoring changes to this quantity. In a way, our method is similar in spirit to others that are based on the monitoring of a damage-sensitive feature of measured data [34][35][36] , with the difference that our damage-sensitive feature, the number of degrees of freedom, has a clear physical meaning and is not affected by changes in the amplitude of the initial condition or in the environmental conditions. Its model-agnostic nature, however, makes it challenging if not impossible to detect where damage has occurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a linear dynamical system, the data‐driven subspace identification method (SIM) is well suitable for the assessment of structure condition and damage detection 22–31 . In practice, the roof of the large‐scale structure in operation is hard to excite using artificial excitation forces and is almost impossible to exclude ambient excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a linear dynamical system, the data-driven subspace identification method (SIM) is well suitable for the assessment of structure condition and damage detection. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] In practice, the roof of the large-scale structure in operation is hard to excite using artificial excitation forces and is almost impossible to exclude ambient excitation. Due to these restrictions, stochastic subspace identification (SSI) method has been developed, in which the unmeasured forces are modeled as white noise time series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%