2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-0970-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subspecialisation in neurosurgery—does size matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the benefits of centralization of specialized, low‐volume, and high‐cost care are intuitively obvious, scientific proof is still lacking . Luft presented the argument in 1979, and many authors since then report data supportive of this concept .…”
Section: The Safe and Sustainable Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the benefits of centralization of specialized, low‐volume, and high‐cost care are intuitively obvious, scientific proof is still lacking . Luft presented the argument in 1979, and many authors since then report data supportive of this concept .…”
Section: The Safe and Sustainable Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,34 Because the NRCT does not collect data on the individual surgeon performing the procedure, we therefore cannot comment on the association. Regardless, the small number of tumor operations being performed by each surgeon would preclude using 30-day mortality rate as a possible differentiator.…”
Section: Institutional Comparisons Of Uk Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery is not always performed by a pediatric neurosurgeon, which can affect the quality of the resection. Several reports have indicated that pediatric neurosurgeons achieve better results with fewer postoperative complications, such as cerebellar mutism 25–27 . These same factors that negatively impact survival outcomes in HICs are likely present, if not exacerbated, in LMICs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%