2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60020-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subspecialty radiology and surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, specialization has changed the way general surgery is practiced, especially at large academic and referral centers [2]. Many large institutions now deal with many of the diseases historically dealt with by general surgeons in ''organ-based'' specialty units (e.g., colorectal, hepatobiliary, breast, upper gastrointestinal) or discipline-specific units [3]. The role of the ''general'' surgeon in these settings is not well defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, specialization has changed the way general surgery is practiced, especially at large academic and referral centers [2]. Many large institutions now deal with many of the diseases historically dealt with by general surgeons in ''organ-based'' specialty units (e.g., colorectal, hepatobiliary, breast, upper gastrointestinal) or discipline-specific units [3]. The role of the ''general'' surgeon in these settings is not well defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation is much rarer as compared to other PV anomalies including preduodenal PV, which was first described by Knight in 1921 [13]. The existence of many diverse rare anomalies and variants, especially those with potential clinical ramifications such as PPPV, lends support to the argument for subspecialist radiologists [14], who are more likely to accurately describe these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The need for standardized reporting of liver lesions using LI-RADS is amplified by the increasing sophistication of the technology, both in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [15,16], with a corresponding increased need for subspecialization [17] among radiologists. Axial imaging technology and the degree of subspecialized skill of those interpreting the resulting images have increased so much over the past 2 decades as to largely supplant biopsy for classically enhancing lesions.…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%