2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substance use disorders in refugee and migrant groups in Sweden: A nationwide cohort study of 1.2 million people

Abstract: BackgroundRefugees are at higher risk of some psychiatric disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychosis, compared with other non-refugee migrants and the majority population. However, it is unclear whether this also applies to substance use disorders, which we investigated in a national register cohort study in Sweden. We also investigated whether risk varied by region of origin, age at migration, time in Sweden, and diagnosis of PTSD.Methods and findingsUsing linked Swedish register… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Low initial use of psychiatric care use across most migrant groups may indicate that these groups have lower overall rates of mental illness in recent migrants (PTSD and psychosis notwithstanding), and hence a lower need of psychiatric care (the ‘healthy migrant effect’). Our group has previously shown that immigrants to Sweden have lower rates of both substance use disorders and suicide, 29 30 for example, although rates converge to the Swedish baseline rate over time. This ‘healthy migrant effect’ may explain patterns of care use observed driven by labour migration, and associated with groups have previously demonstrated better general mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Low initial use of psychiatric care use across most migrant groups may indicate that these groups have lower overall rates of mental illness in recent migrants (PTSD and psychosis notwithstanding), and hence a lower need of psychiatric care (the ‘healthy migrant effect’). Our group has previously shown that immigrants to Sweden have lower rates of both substance use disorders and suicide, 29 30 for example, although rates converge to the Swedish baseline rate over time. This ‘healthy migrant effect’ may explain patterns of care use observed driven by labour migration, and associated with groups have previously demonstrated better general mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Further, research has documented that immigrant groups with SUD and MHD are at a high risk of neglect even in developed healthcare systems; possible reasons include lack of existing healthcare policies for these groups and insufficient funding to target specific areas of immigrants’ mental health care. 11 A recent Swedish cohort study reported increased rates of SUDs among immigrants who migrated at an early age or had lived for a long time in the host country 12 ; they were further disadvantaged by poor access to healthcare. 13,14 In addition, immigrants who have connections to a closely-knit drug scene or group may be hampered from seeking mental health treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PLOS Medicine publishes research findings of general interest to the medical and public health communities, we received manuscript submissions describing research conducted in only a limited number of countries. In this Special Issue, the sole paper representing research conducted outside the US, Canada, and the UK is the report by Samantha Harris and colleagues [60], who analyzed Swedish register data from 1984–2016 to show that both refugee and nonrefugee migrants had lower rates of substance use disorders compared with Swedish-born individuals but that over time, the rates among migrants converged to that of Swedish-born individuals. The issue regrettably features no articles from Africa, Asia, or South America, and no articles focused on indigenous populations or on racial, ethnic, or sexual minority groups.…”
Section: Gaps In the Literature And The Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%