2011
DOI: 10.3109/14659891.2011.580415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substance use during and after pregnancy among a national cohort of pregnant women in opioid maintenance treatment and their partners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
(229 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First trimester Second trimester Third trimester 8 (15) 22 (42) 22 (42) 28 (37) 27 (36) 21 (28) 0.025* (23) 23 (44) 13 (25) 4 (8) 12 (16) 25 (33) 29 (38) 10 (13) 0. pregnant women in treatment in Norway were also in OMT at the time (Lund et al, 2012). Most of the women with children in our study (83%) had children placed in child protection services.…”
Section: Stage Of Gestation At Admissionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…First trimester Second trimester Third trimester 8 (15) 22 (42) 22 (42) 28 (37) 27 (36) 21 (28) 0.025* (23) 23 (44) 13 (25) 4 (8) 12 (16) 25 (33) 29 (38) 10 (13) 0. pregnant women in treatment in Norway were also in OMT at the time (Lund et al, 2012). Most of the women with children in our study (83%) had children placed in child protection services.…”
Section: Stage Of Gestation At Admissionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This study is one of several based on the cohort Konijnenberg & Melinder, 2015;Lund et al, 2012;Melinder et al, 2013;Sarfi, Smith, Waal, & Sundet, 2011;Sarfi et al, 2013). While not all mothers participated in interviews at the 4-year follow up, this is not likely to affect the representativeness of the sample, as described in a previous study on the cohort (Lund et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The women had been in OMT on average two and half year before they became pregnant with the child followed in this study. The cohort is described in greater detail elsewhere (Bakstad et al, 2009;Lund, Brendryen, & Ravndal, 2014;Lund et al, 2012). Demographic and birth characteristics are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pregnant women who use illicit drugs or receive OMT often belongs to low-income families, they are not necessarily homeless or experience the same degree of poverty as many drug users in the US. With regards to OMT in Norway, opioid dependent women have typically been in OMT for about two years prior to becoming pregnant, they stay in treatment for a long time and the use of illicit substances and alcohol during pregnancy is low (10,23). These factors distinguish the pregnant women in OMT in Norway from women in previous studies.…”
Section: Possibilities With Observational Studies Using Registry Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors distinguish the pregnant women in OMT in Norway from women in previous studies. On the other hand, women are similar with regard to frequency and extent of smoking during pregnancy and the substantial somatic and psychological problems (19,23).…”
Section: Possibilities With Observational Studies Using Registry Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%