2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substance-Use Outcomes at 18 Months Past Baseline

Abstract: Background-The study's objective was to examine the effects of "real world," community-based implementation of universal preventive interventions selected from a menu, including effects specific to higher-and lower-risk subsamples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effectiveness of the PROSPER model (Spoth et al 2004, 2007 c ) throughout middle and high school has been documented in earlier reports on this cluster randomized controlled trial, which began in 2001. Previously reported findings include effective participant recruitment (Spoth et al 2007 a ), maintenance of high quality implementation (Spoth et al 2007 b ), and sustainability of intervention delivery (Welsh et al 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effectiveness of the PROSPER model (Spoth et al 2004, 2007 c ) throughout middle and high school has been documented in earlier reports on this cluster randomized controlled trial, which began in 2001. Previously reported findings include effective participant recruitment (Spoth et al 2007 a ), maintenance of high quality implementation (Spoth et al 2007 b ), and sustainability of intervention delivery (Welsh et al 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For their school-based intervention, four community teams selected Life Skills Training (LST) , four selected Project Alert , and six selected the All Stars curriculum. Brief information on each program is in Table 1 (for more detail, see Spoth et al 2007 c ). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use survey and social network data from the PROSPER study, a place-randomized trial of a model for delivery of substance misuse interventions conducted in 28 public school districts in rural Pennsylvania and Iowa (Spoth et al, 2004; Spoth et al, 2007). PROSPER’s sample consists of two successive cohorts of students who were first interviewed in the fall of 6th grade with follow-ups conducted each spring from 6th through 9th grade.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communities were blocked by district size and geographic location and were randomized to receive either the PROSPER partnership intervention or standard programming services. Intervention and control groups did not differ at baseline in terms of demographics or youth outcomes (Spoth, Redmond, Shin, Greenberg, Clair, & Feinberg, 2007). The PROSPER intervention was associated with decreased substance use at 18 month and 4.5 and 6.5 year follow-ups (Spoth et al, 2007; Spoth, Redmond, Clair, Shin, Greenberg, & Feinberg, 2011; Spoth, Redmond, Shin, Greenberg, Feinberg, Schainker, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%