2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substance use screening and rates of treatment referral among justice-involved youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results may suggest that practitioners should supplement the MAYSI-2 with other measures of incarcerated youth. For example, researchers (Williams et al, 2019; Yurasek et al, 2021) suggest that the CRAFFT (Knight et al, 1999) may also be a useful screening tool concerning incarcerated youth substance use. Additionally, the Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd edition (BASC-3; Reynolds et al, 2015), should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results may suggest that practitioners should supplement the MAYSI-2 with other measures of incarcerated youth. For example, researchers (Williams et al, 2019; Yurasek et al, 2021) suggest that the CRAFFT (Knight et al, 1999) may also be a useful screening tool concerning incarcerated youth substance use. Additionally, the Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd edition (BASC-3; Reynolds et al, 2015), should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 1500 youths are referred to the family court annually. In a recent study of a sample of youth screened by the family court, 173 (50%) of 348 youths screened positive for problematic cannabis use [ 63 ], indicating that the recruitment pool is sufficiently robust to support the proposed recruitment targets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FLDJJ uses the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument – Second Version (MAYSI-2). Some scholars suggest incorporating other validated screening tools during intake, such as CRAFFT [ 57 ] or UNCOPE [ 58 , 59 ], to further assess substance abuse and risk for SUD to address response bias. For example, future research should investigate disparities in services among Native American populations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%