2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantial impact of FDG PET imaging on the therapy decision in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
57
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, only 1 (17%) out of 6 patients with unifocal FDG abnormality had positive BMB in contrast to 8/12 (67%) patients with multifocal FDG abnormalities. This observation highlights the significance of the ''pattern of FDG abnormality'' in the likelihood of bone/bone marrow disease involvement [27]. However, as no FDG-avid bone lesion was biopsied, the specificity of these findings cannot be calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our cohort, only 1 (17%) out of 6 patients with unifocal FDG abnormality had positive BMB in contrast to 8/12 (67%) patients with multifocal FDG abnormalities. This observation highlights the significance of the ''pattern of FDG abnormality'' in the likelihood of bone/bone marrow disease involvement [27]. However, as no FDG-avid bone lesion was biopsied, the specificity of these findings cannot be calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The meta-analysis by Pakos et al [1] summarising the results of 13 studies comprising a total of 587 patients showed that compared with BMB, the weighted sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 51% and 91%, respectively. In the sub-group analysis, BMB showed better sensitivity in HL (76%) and in aggressive NHL, while FDG-PET gave false negative results in two-thirds of patients with bone marrow involvement in more indolent histological forms of NHL, leading to the conclusion that the role of PET/CT would be complementary [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Fuster et al [34] investigated the role of FDG-PET vs bone marrow disease in detecting bone marrow disease in patients with HL and NHL and found out that FDG-PET was more sensitive than BMB in HL and NHL with the exception of Grade 1 and 2 follicular lymphomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] Previous publications compared imaging techniques but do not report the impact of imaging on the more relevant final clinical stage, inclusive of bone marrow biopsy, and some publications included patients with HL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). [17][18][19][20][21] Response assessment with the 5-PS has been reported by a number of investigators to have good interobserver agreement in a training set of 50 patients, 22 in a study of 260 advanced HL patients with international expert readers, 23 and in pediatric HL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al tener similares resultados que la biopsia de médula ósea, la PET-FDG podría utilizarse en sustitución de esta técnica invasiva, que, por otro lado, presenta en algunos casos falsos negativos. En otros casos la PET-FDG serviría de guía para indicar el lugar más favorable a biopsiar y reducir el número de biopsias negativas [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] . Actualmente, los criterios de indicación de la PET en los linfomas son 1, 2 :…”
Section: Linfomasunclassified