2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantial performance discrepancies among commercially available kits for reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction: A systematic comparative investigator-driven approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For qPCR, equal amounts of total RNA (1 µg) were transcribed in cDNA with RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas [27]). Amplification products were analyzed using gel electrophoresis, melting curve analysis, and sequencing to confirm the PCR product specificity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For qPCR, equal amounts of total RNA (1 µg) were transcribed in cDNA with RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas [27]). Amplification products were analyzed using gel electrophoresis, melting curve analysis, and sequencing to confirm the PCR product specificity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that the variation introduced by each step is strictly dependent on the kit used, as different commercially available kits will exhibit differences in reproducibility (7, 9) and consequently, the CVs determined here are merely representative. Never theless, our findings clearly indicate that among the variables studied, biofilm growth made the greatest contribution to the variability detected in gene expression quantification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to understand the origin of such variability in order to be able to mitigate it. Variability and bias in the quantification of gene expression has been attributed to biological factors, including ( i ) RNA degradation (5), ( ii ) the presence of inhibitors (6), and ( iii ) the nature of the sample used (7), as well as non-biological factors such as ( i ) the use of different RNA extraction procedures (8), ( ii ) complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, and ( iii ) quantitative PCR (qPCR) kits (9, 10). Here, we measured variability associated with all three key steps in gene expression quantification: RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qPCR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA concentration and integrity were analyzed using Nanodrop spectrophotometer and QIAxcel microcapillar electrophoresis apparatus and was followed by reverse transcription of 1.0 μg RNA using standard conditions (Thermo Scientific) (36). The expression profile of selected mRNA was measured using the Rotor-Gene Q 2plex system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%