2015
DOI: 10.1002/2327-6924.12155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantive review of the literature of medication treatment of chronic low back pain among adults

Abstract: Purpose Pain can be debilitating, and it is often inadequately treated, particularly among patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). CLBP has a substantial economic impact, as it affects an individual's ability to perform activities of daily living and maintain employment. This study aims to review original studies related to the evidence‐based management of patients with CLBP to develop an algorithm for prescribing medications and recommending other treatment modalities for patients with CLBP. Data sources … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During follow-up, over 70% of LBP cases reported using medication for LBP, which is comparable with previous observations among industrial workers and patients with LBP (58% to 80%; Cherkin et al, 1998;Ivanova et al, 2011;Kapellusch et al, 2014) but considerably higher than that observed in a gen-( 35%; Vasseljen et al, 2013). This study also found that NSAIDs and OTC pain relievers were the most frequently used types of medications ( 90%) to treat LBP in accordance with prior studies of industrial workers (Kapellusch et al, 2014) and general population (Vasseljen et al, 2013 world practice pattern of the clinical guidelines for LBP management, regardless of an individual's occupation (Bannwarth et al, 2012;Chou et al, 2007;Falope & Appel, 2015;Hart et al, 1995;Holcomb, 2008).…”
Section: Lbp Surveillance and Relevance Of Pain Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During follow-up, over 70% of LBP cases reported using medication for LBP, which is comparable with previous observations among industrial workers and patients with LBP (58% to 80%; Cherkin et al, 1998;Ivanova et al, 2011;Kapellusch et al, 2014) but considerably higher than that observed in a gen-( 35%; Vasseljen et al, 2013). This study also found that NSAIDs and OTC pain relievers were the most frequently used types of medications ( 90%) to treat LBP in accordance with prior studies of industrial workers (Kapellusch et al, 2014) and general population (Vasseljen et al, 2013 world practice pattern of the clinical guidelines for LBP management, regardless of an individual's occupation (Bannwarth et al, 2012;Chou et al, 2007;Falope & Appel, 2015;Hart et al, 1995;Holcomb, 2008).…”
Section: Lbp Surveillance and Relevance Of Pain Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This study also found that NSAIDs and OTC pain relievers were the most frequently used types of medications (90%) to treat LBP in accordance with prior studies of industrial workers (Kapellusch et al, 2014) and general population (Vasseljen et al, 2013). These findings may reflect the real-world practice pattern of the clinical guidelines for LBP management, regardless of an individual’s occupation (Bannwarth et al, 2012; Chou et al, 2007; Falope & Appel, 2015; Hart et al, 1995; Holcomb, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 A wide range of pharmacological options, such as opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and gabapentin, among others, are currently available for the management of chronic pain. [9][10][11] Nevertheless, current treatments remain somewhat limited with over 50% of patients experiencing an inadequate relief of pain that requires the emergence of fresh therapeutic alternatives. 12 In the classical cis-signaling pathway, the initiation of the inflammatory response by Interleukin-6 (IL-6) occurs through its binding with glycoprotein-130 (gp130) at the IL-6 receptor locus present on the cell membrane (m-IL-6R).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%