2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60615-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituting HCG with GnRH agonist to trigger final follicular maturation – a retrospective comparison of three different ovarian stimulation protocols

Abstract: The study retrospectively evaluated the influence of triggering final oocyte maturation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist on the outcome of IVF cycles. Four hundred and sixty consecutive women admitted to the IVF unit during a 4-year period were enrolled in the study. Ovarian stimulation characteristics and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between three groups: patients at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), undergoing either the long GnRH-agonist protocol (agoni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) which combines GnRH antagonist co-treatment and GnRHa trigger has since become a common tool aiming to eliminate severe early OHSS and to support the concept of an OHSS-free clinic [2,3]. However, due to the reported significantly reduced clinical pregnancy and increased first trimester pregnancy loss [4,5], efforts have been made to improve reproductive outcome by manipulating the luteal phase. One of the suggested optional strategies aiming to improve outcome was the addition of low-dose (1500 IU) HCG bolus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) which combines GnRH antagonist co-treatment and GnRHa trigger has since become a common tool aiming to eliminate severe early OHSS and to support the concept of an OHSS-free clinic [2,3]. However, due to the reported significantly reduced clinical pregnancy and increased first trimester pregnancy loss [4,5], efforts have been made to improve reproductive outcome by manipulating the luteal phase. One of the suggested optional strategies aiming to improve outcome was the addition of low-dose (1500 IU) HCG bolus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis showed that the use of GnRH or hCG for final oocyte maturation, and in which GnRH antagonist was used to inhibit premature LH surge, yielded a comparable number of oocytes capable of undergoing fertilization and subsequent embryonic cleavage [4]. Moreover, a retrospective analysis of the use of GnRH agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation on the outcome of IVF cyclesfound that the use of a flexible multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol with GnRH-agonist for final oocyte maturation in fresh autologous cycles in highresponder patients eliminated the risk of OHSS [5]. However, the likelihood of an ongoing clinical pregnancy and implantation was significantly lower after GnRH agonist triggering compared with the standard hCG treatment [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a retrospective analysis of the use of GnRH agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation on the outcome of IVF cyclesfound that the use of a flexible multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol with GnRH-agonist for final oocyte maturation in fresh autologous cycles in highresponder patients eliminated the risk of OHSS [5]. However, the likelihood of an ongoing clinical pregnancy and implantation was significantly lower after GnRH agonist triggering compared with the standard hCG treatment [4,5]. Agonist triggering has also been tested in frozen-embryo replacement IVF cycles; these studies found that the likelihood of a live birth after GnRH triggering of final oocyte maturation was not impaired, suggesting that the impaired clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF cycles may be due to endometrial factors in antagonist cycles triggered for oocyte maturation with GnRH agonists [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Orvieto ve ark.nın OHSS için yüksek riskli 67 hastayı dâhil ederek yaptığı bir kohort çalışmada ise Engmann ve ark.nın çalışmasında belirtilen yoğun luteal destek uygulamalarına rağmen implantasyon ve klinik gebelik oranları, daha önce yaptıkları benzer ama yoğun luteal destek içermeyen çalışmanın sonuç-ları ile kıyaslanabilir seviyede düşük kalmıştır. 28,29 Griffin ve ark. 2012 yılında yeni bir yaklaşım olarak hastaları luteal destek için FOM tetikleme gü-nündeki östradiol konsantrasyonlarına göre ikiye ayırmayı önermişlerdir.…”
Section: Gnrha Teti̇kleme Sonrasi Yüksek Doz öStradi̇ol Ve Progesteron unclassified