Substitution of low-risk skin cancer hospital care towards primary care: A qualitative study on views of general practitioners and dermatologists

Abstract

BackgroundRising healthcare expenditures places the potential for substitution of hospital care towards primary care high on the political agenda. As low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) care is one of the potential targets for substitution of hospital care towards primary care the objective of this study is to gain insight in the views of healthcare professionals regarding substitution of skin cancer care, and to identify perceived barriers and potential strategies to facilitate substitution.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted consisting of 40 interviews with dermatologists and GPs and three focus groups with 18 selected GPs with noted willingness regarding substitution of skin cancer care. The interviews and focus groups focused on general views, perceived barriers and potential strategies to facilitate substitution of skin cancer care, using predefined topic lists. All sessions were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the program AtlasTi.ResultsGPs were generally positive regarding substitution of skin care whereas dermatologists expressed more concerns. Lack of trust in GPs to adequately perform skin cancer care and a preference of patients for dermatologists are reported as barriers by dermatologists. The main barriers reported by GPs were a lack of confidence in own skills to perform skin cancer care, a lack of trust from both patients and dermatologists and limited time and financial compensation. Facilitating strategies suggested by both groups mainly focused on improving GPs’ education and improving the collaboration between primary and secondary care. GPs additionally suggested efforts from dermatologists to increase their own and patients’ trust in GPs, and time and financial compensation. The selected group of GPs suggested practical solutions to facilitate substitution focusing on changes in organizational structure including horizontal referring, outreach models and practice size reduction.ConclusionsGPs and, to lesser extent, dermatologists are positive regarding substitution of low-risk BCC care, though report substantial barriers that need to be addressed before substitution can be further implemented. Aside from essential strategies such as improving GPs’ skin cancer education and time and financial compensation, rearranging the organizational structure in primary care and between primary and secondary care may facilitate effective and safe substitution of low-risk BCC care.

The effect of a dermato‐oncological training programme on the diagnostic skills and quality of referrals for suspicious skin lesions by general practitioners*

“…This might be explained by fewer TBSEs performed by GPs (although strongly encouraged in the DOTP) and/or previously shown lower diagnostic skills in diagnosing (pre)malignant skin lesions compared with dermatologists 5. Lack of time in primary care could be a factor contributing to the above‐mentioned points for improvement 9,21. Obviously, transfer of SC care puts more pressure on primary care and a sufficient amount of time, finances and healthcare providers seems essential to facilitate this.…”

“…Previous research showed GPs and dermatologists to be generally positive about this transfer of care. 9 At the beginning of the project, regional guidelines were drawn up concerning the diagnostics and treatment of (pre)malignant skin lesions in primary care, and when a GP should refer a patient to a dermatologist (Appendix S1; see Supporting Information). These regional guidelines were based on existing (inter)national guidelines.…”

“…Previous research identified a rather poor clinical recognition of (pre)malignant skin tumours by GPs, leading to a high rate of potentially unnecessary referrals 5. As previously suggested, better training of GPs might improve their diagnostic skills, diminish the number of potentially unnecessary referrals and thereby optimize efficacy in SC care 6,7,8,9. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a dedicated dermato‐oncological training programme (DOTP) for GPs improves the diagnostic skills and quality of referrals by GPs.…”

“…5 As previously suggested, better training of GPs might improve their diagnostic skills, diminish the number of potentially unnecessary referrals and thereby optimize efficacy in SC care. [6][7][8][9] The aim of this study was to evaluate if a dedicated dermato-oncological training programme (DOTP) for GPs improves the diagnostic skills and quality of referrals by GPs.…”

Brunsting-Perry Pemphigoid as Differential Diagnosis of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

“…Skin cancer is often managed in primary care and specialties without the involvement of dermatologists [3]. It is common practice to excise lesions suspicious for skin cancer without prior histological confirmation.…”