1989
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.9.9.4083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substitution of lysine for arginine at position 42 of human transforming growth factor-alpha eliminates biological activity without changing internal disulfide bonds.

Abstract: Transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) is a growth-promoting protein that binds to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor. To identify critical residues that govern TGF-alpha-EGF receptor binding, we prepared site-specific substitution mutants of TGF-alpha. Mutant proteins were tested in receptor-binding and mitogenesis assays. Semiconservative substitutions at positions 4, 12, 18, and 45 decreased biological activity 2.1- to 14-fold. The conservative substitution of lysine for arginine at position 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hEPR is a much weaker antagonist of the ErbB-1 and ErbB-4 receptors with IC 50 values of 2800 nM and Ͼ5 M, respectively (34), indicating that 9E5 IgG binds to hEPR more strongly than ErbB-1 and ErbB-4. According to previous studies, mutational analysis and chemical regeneration suggest that the guanidinium group of Arg E40 in hEPR is essential for binding of the ErbB receptor (40,41). These results support that 9E5(Fab) acts as not only the simple capturer of EPR but also the competitive neutralization antibody against EGFR with inhibition of the functional residue Arg E40 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…hEPR is a much weaker antagonist of the ErbB-1 and ErbB-4 receptors with IC 50 values of 2800 nM and Ͼ5 M, respectively (34), indicating that 9E5 IgG binds to hEPR more strongly than ErbB-1 and ErbB-4. According to previous studies, mutational analysis and chemical regeneration suggest that the guanidinium group of Arg E40 in hEPR is essential for binding of the ErbB receptor (40,41). These results support that 9E5(Fab) acts as not only the simple capturer of EPR but also the competitive neutralization antibody against EGFR with inhibition of the functional residue Arg E40 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Arg-42, which appears to be less important for binding based on the NOE criterion, may play a structural role in preserving the local conformation of Phe-15, which is a critical residue based upon the NOE data. Structural studies of the inactive R42K mutant exclude any gross conformational changes; however, do not rule out subtle effects that alter the microenvironment of the phenylalanine (17,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) The binding data indicate the requirement for a polar, isosteric sidechain at position 16 of hEGF that functions as both hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor. The reduced binding affinity of the H18K hTGF␣ mutant [Defeo-Jones et al, 1989] suggests that H18 in hTGF␣ may play a similar role. (iii) As the H16 mutants are similar to wild-type hEGF in their native conformation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partially purified Pseudomonas exotoxin A-hEGF chimeras in which H16 was replaced with Q display reduced receptor binding affinity (19% of wildtype) and cytotoxic activity [Shiah et al, 1992]. In another report, a highly purified H18K hTGF␣ mutant was shown to retain 22% relative binding affinity and 7% relative mitogenic potency [Defeo-Jones et al, 1989]. This suggests a stringent requirement for H since semiconservative changes to either Q or K result in loss of biological activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%