2006
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substitutions, abstract number systems and the space filling property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Tribonacci case they found a close connection with number systems. The latter connection was generalized by Fuchs and Tijdeman in [3]. In the present paper we generalize the former property to unimodular substitutions defined over two letters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In the Tribonacci case they found a close connection with number systems. The latter connection was generalized by Fuchs and Tijdeman in [3]. In the present paper we generalize the former property to unimodular substitutions defined over two letters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Analogous statements appear in various frameworks, see e.g. (Akiyama 2000), (Arnoux, Berthé, and Siegel 2004), (Barge and Diamond 2002), , (Fernique 2006), (Fuchs and Tijdeman 2006) or .…”
Section: The Ancestor Graphmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is expressed in (Berthé and Siegel 2005) in terms of the DumontThomas numeration. It also appears in (Fuchs and Tijdeman 2006) in a related context. Note that we can use the vast literature on the (F) property in the beta-numeration framework to exhibit classes of beta-substitutions that satisfy the geometric finiteness property (see e.g.…”
Section: Section 54mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…, and by the induction hypothesis we obtain the result. Furthermore, to show the inclusion (10), it suffices to prove that ka ∈ αS[α], ∀ k ∈ Z, or equivalently (11) kb ∈ S[α], ∀k ∈ Z, as any rational integer may be written ε + ka for some ε ∈ S and k ∈ Z. Assume first that 0 < −b < a and choose S α = {0, .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 2 (Ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%