2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substorm injection of relativistic electrons to geosynchronous orbit during the great magnetic storm of March 24, 1991

Abstract: Abstract. The great March 1991 magnetic storm and the immediately preceding solar energetic particle event (SEP) were among the largest observed during the past solar cycle, and have been the object of intense study. We investigate here, using data from eight satellites, the very large delayed buildup of relativistic electron flux in the outer zone during a 1.5-day period beginning 2 days after onset of the main phase of this storm. A notable feature of the March storm is the intense substorm activity througho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several studies aimed at the modeling of electron injections as they are well-known signatures of a substorm in the near-Earth space (Li et al 1998;Zaharia et al 2000;Sarris et al 2002;Gabrielse et al 2012Gabrielse et al , 2014Gabrielse et al , 2016Ganushkina et al 2013Ganushkina et al , 2014. These models give relatively good agreement with the observed dispersionless electron injections at geostationary orbit during specific events (Ingraham et al 2001;Fok et al 2001a;Li et al 2003;Mithaiwala and Horton 2005;Liu et al 2009). The substorm-associated electromagnetic fields are very complex and their proper representation is still missing from the modeling efforts for keV electrons in the inner magnetosphere.…”
Section: Ring Current Electrons and Effects On Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…There have been several studies aimed at the modeling of electron injections as they are well-known signatures of a substorm in the near-Earth space (Li et al 1998;Zaharia et al 2000;Sarris et al 2002;Gabrielse et al 2012Gabrielse et al , 2014Gabrielse et al , 2016Ganushkina et al 2013Ganushkina et al , 2014. These models give relatively good agreement with the observed dispersionless electron injections at geostationary orbit during specific events (Ingraham et al 2001;Fok et al 2001a;Li et al 2003;Mithaiwala and Horton 2005;Liu et al 2009). The substorm-associated electromagnetic fields are very complex and their proper representation is still missing from the modeling efforts for keV electrons in the inner magnetosphere.…”
Section: Ring Current Electrons and Effects On Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Figure 1 for instance shows that localized wave source around L ∼ 6-7 should produce relatively wide wave distribution at L ∼ 5 up to L ∼ 10. This localized source can mimic wave generation by transient particle injections into the inner magnetosphere (such injections often stop around L ∼ 6-7 and can penetrate up to the plasmapause; see Ingraham et al, 2001;Dubyagin et al, 2011, and references therein). Our simulations demonstrate that waves generated in a localized source fill a wide region due to the divergence of their trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fronts could result in the injection and energization of both ring current ions and high-energy electrons (10-700 keV), which are the dominant contribution to the particle energy density and pressure around the Earth during major geomagnetic storms. There is evidence (Ingraham et al 2001) suggesting that intense substorm injection fronts may be able to energize significant fluxes of electrons up to >1 MeV below L = 4−5 over time scales of minutes. However, our understanding of the efficiency of the mechanism is largely based on CRRES, which only saw one very large storm on the night side of the Earth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%