1997
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-997-1257-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substorm onset identification using neural networks and Pi2 pulsations

Abstract: Abstract. The pattern recognition capabilities of arti®-cial neural networks (ANNs) have for the ®rst time been used to identify Pi2 pulsations in magnetometer data, which in turn serve as indicators of substorm onsets and intensi®cations. The pulsation spectrum was used as input to the ANN and the network was trained to give an output of +1 for Pi2 signatures and A1 for non-Pi2 signatures. In order to evaluate the degree of success of the neural-network procedure for identifying Pi2 pulsations, the ANN was us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work to automatically and routinely identify substorm onset has largely concentrated on ground‐based magnetometer observations of the impulsive Pi1 and Pi2 ultralow frequency (ULF) magnetic waves observed at substorm onset [ Jacobs et al ., ] that are highly correlated with auroral intensity [ Rae et al ., ] and may be used as a proxy for auroral substorm onset [ Sakurai and Saito , ]. Sutcliffe [] trained a neural network to determine substorm onsets by identifying Pi2 pulsations at low‐latitude ground‐based magnetometer stations. Similarly, Nose et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work to automatically and routinely identify substorm onset has largely concentrated on ground‐based magnetometer observations of the impulsive Pi1 and Pi2 ultralow frequency (ULF) magnetic waves observed at substorm onset [ Jacobs et al ., ] that are highly correlated with auroral intensity [ Rae et al ., ] and may be used as a proxy for auroral substorm onset [ Sakurai and Saito , ]. Sutcliffe [] trained a neural network to determine substorm onsets by identifying Pi2 pulsations at low‐latitude ground‐based magnetometer stations. Similarly, Nose et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[] used a Meyer wavelet to automatically identify Pi2 pulsations at low‐latitude ground‐based magnetometer stations. While both Sutcliffe [] and Nose et al . [] were able to routinely identify Pi2 pulsations, the delay between auroral zone ULF waves and low‐latitude ULF waves can be on the order of minutes, introducing additional timing uncertainties when observing ULF waves away from the onset location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pi2 pulsations recorded at low latitudes are regarded to be one of the clearest indicators of magnetospheric substorm onsets and intensifications [ Saito et al , ]. Consequently, a number of researchers have developed automated methods of identifying substorm onsets using Pi2 pulsations [ Sutcliffe , ; Nosé et al , ].…”
Section: Geomagnetic Pulsationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of a procedure to determine Pi2 onset automatically and accurately would be desirable. Automatic determination of Pi2 onset has been carried out by employing various data adaptive filters such as wavelet analysis [ Nose' et al , 1998; Tsunezawa et al , 1999] and an artificial neural network (ANN) [ Sutcliffe , 1997]. Although these methods are useful for selecting Pi2 onsets, the precision of the determined onset time does not meet our requirement, for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the threshold for selecting the Pi2 pulsation tends to be arbitrary, which affects the estimated onset time. The approach using an ANN mitigates this problem of a reasonable choice of thresholds but still suffers from insufficient resolution in estimating the onset time because the lower‐frequency components of the amplitude spectrum are used as input data in the ANN [ Sutcliffe , 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%