“…Through the criteria used, 11.9% of the sampled articles across the behavioral tests were published using appropriate ethological motivational principles (white lowest rectangle) and only n = 50 met the full inclusion criteria, with the Light/Dark Test having better reporting (62.25%), followed by the Open Field (30.09%), then the Elevated Plus Maze (41.41%), and finally the Three Chamber Social Interaction Test with the worst (34.69%) of the respective samples. (Banaskowski et al, 2015;Bentea et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2015;Sauce et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2016;Acevedo et al, 2016;Christensen et al, 2016;Farajdokht et al, 2016;Fernandez et al, 2016;Labots et al, 2016;Miranda-Morales and Pautassi, 2016;Vogt et al, 2016;Benoit et al, 2017;Borbely et al, 2017;Chandra Sekhar et al, 2017;Khalil and Fendt, 2017;Makinson et al, 2017;Rogers et al, 2017;Sirohi et al, 2017;Heinla et al, 2018;Keenan et al, 2018;Mahmoudi et al, 2018;Wille-Bille et al, 2018;Zhang and Yao, 2018;Laureano-Melo et al, 2019;Morgan et al, 2019;], the Open Field Test [n = 10 (Zhang C. et al, 2015;Estork et al, 2016;Casarrubea et al, 2017;Kawabe, 2017;Khalil and Fendt, 2017;Kuniishi et al, 2017;Blume et al, 2018;Perea-Rodriguez et al, 2018;Struntz and Siegel, 2018;Hetzler et al, 2019)…”