2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate Binding Specifically Modulates Domain Arrangements in Adenylate Kinase

Abstract: The enzyme adenylate kinase (ADK) features two substrate binding domains that undergo large-scale motions during catalysis. In the apo state, the enzyme preferentially adopts a globally open state with accessible binding sites. Binding of two substrate molecules (AMP + ATP or ADP + ADP) results in a closed domain conformation, allowing efficient phosphoryl-transfer catalysis. We employed molecular dynamics simulations to systematically investigate how the individual domain motions are modulated by the binding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noncompetitive inhibitors are known to bind to the enzyme at allosteric sites (i.e., locations other than its active site). Adenylate kinase is a small monomeric enzyme consisting of CORE and LID domains and two substrate binding sites (NMPbd and NTPbd) that are specifically occupied by AMP and ATP, or alternatively by one ADP molecule each [ 70 ]. The LID domain and CORE domain with NTPbd form the ATP binding pocket, while the NMPbd and CORE domain form the AMP binding pocket [ 71 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncompetitive inhibitors are known to bind to the enzyme at allosteric sites (i.e., locations other than its active site). Adenylate kinase is a small monomeric enzyme consisting of CORE and LID domains and two substrate binding sites (NMPbd and NTPbd) that are specifically occupied by AMP and ATP, or alternatively by one ADP molecule each [ 70 ]. The LID domain and CORE domain with NTPbd form the ATP binding pocket, while the NMPbd and CORE domain form the AMP binding pocket [ 71 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding to the ADP synthesis, K M for AMP is 10-fold higher than K M for ATP. This significant difference in the affinity between AMP and ATP is probably due to a more unstable binding of AMP onto AMP binding site, whereas the ATP binding onto LID domain seems to be favored ( Zeller and Zacharias, 2015 ). Moreover, the turnover numbers are in compliance with the release form of products, where ADP liberation from AMP occurs through AMP binding site, and ADP liberation from ATP occurs through CORE domain ( Zeller and Zacharias, 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significant difference in the affinity between AMP and ATP is probably due to a more unstable binding of AMP onto AMP binding site, whereas the ATP binding onto LID domain seems to be favored ( Zeller and Zacharias, 2015 ). Moreover, the turnover numbers are in compliance with the release form of products, where ADP liberation from AMP occurs through AMP binding site, and ADP liberation from ATP occurs through CORE domain ( Zeller and Zacharias, 2015 ). Finally, the difference in the catalytic efficiency between AMP and ATP fits the model described by Ådén et al (2013) where AMP can bind to LID with a very low affinity generating an unproductive complex ( Whitford et al, 2007 ; Ådén et al, 2013 ; Zeller and Zacharias, 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various computational approaches have been developed to discover the collective motions associated with the dynamics of proteins, most of them applied to protein folding simulations and ligand‐protein docking simulations ,. The time scales of the conformational transitions of proteins are frequently of order of microseconds to seconds while MD is restricted to integration timesteps of a few femtoseconds.…”
Section: Modeling the Dynamics Of Ligand‐protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%