2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b11525
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate-Independent Micropatterning of Polymer Brushes Based on Photolytic Deactivation of Chemical Vapor Deposition Based Surface-Initiated Atom-Transfer Radical Polymerization Initiator Films

Abstract: Precise microscale arrangement of biomolecules and cells is essential for tissue engineering, microarray development, diagnostic sensors, and fundamental research in the biosciences. Biofunctional polymer brushes have attracted broad interest in these applications. However, patterning approaches to creating microstructured biointerfaces based on polymer brushes often involve tedious, expensive, and complicated procedures that are specifically designed for model substrates. We report a substrate-independent, fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Post protein adsorption, a clear change of depth (around 0.5 µm) was evident on the textured surface as viewed from the three dimensional projected images and comparing their line profiles (before and after protein adsorption) captured by AFM (Figure 5e). A 135 nm change in surface roughness ( R q ) [ 70 ] of textured area upon protein adsorption further affirmed the selective protein patterning on textured area having no polyPEGMA brush (Figure 5e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Post protein adsorption, a clear change of depth (around 0.5 µm) was evident on the textured surface as viewed from the three dimensional projected images and comparing their line profiles (before and after protein adsorption) captured by AFM (Figure 5e). A 135 nm change in surface roughness ( R q ) [ 70 ] of textured area upon protein adsorption further affirmed the selective protein patterning on textured area having no polyPEGMA brush (Figure 5e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…During in vitro screening experiments, transfection assays are typically miniaturized to 384- or 1536-well plates to reduce reagent consumption and to boost throughput . Cellular microarrays obtained using micropatterned protein-coated cell culture substrates have also emerged as promising platforms for studying material–cell interactions. To circumvent problems arising from evaporation of small volumes in well-plate and microarray based studies, microfluidic tools (Figure ) have been developed to boost the experimental throughput during in vitro transfection. Candiani and co-workers developed a microfluidic device wherein lipoplex dilution and formulation, cell culture, and transfection operations could be performed serially in a single device consisting of connected chambers .…”
Section: High-throughput Evaluation Of Polymeric Gene Delivery In Cel...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their inherent antibiofouling nature, the fabrication of microarrays on the polymer brush modified substrates allows biomolecular immobilization and recognition with low nonspecific interactions, resulting in a significant improvement of the specificity and reproducibility of microarray [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95]. In addition, the 3D structure of polymer brush modified substrates provide a high biomolecule immobilization capacity and accessible scaffolds with sufficient space for biomolecule binding, leading to an increase in the sensitivity of microarrays.…”
Section: Polymer Brush-based Microarraysmentioning
confidence: 99%