2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano11030781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate-Induced Strain Effect on Structural and Magnetic Properties of La0.5Sr0.5CoO3 Films

Abstract: We present a detailed study about the substrate-induced strain and thickness effects on the structure and magnetic properties of La0.5Sr0.5CoO3 films. The in-plane tensile or compressive strain imposed by four different substrates configures an in-plane or out-of-plane easy axis, respectively. The presence of a soft magnetic phase at the interface is also conditioned by the type of strain. The obtained results are discussed in terms of the different anisotropies that participate and control the final magnetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 on the STO substrate with tensile strain ( a / c = 1.020) also exhibited ferromagnetism and metallic conductivity, but its T C is lower (∼90 K) than the nearly unstrained SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 /LSAT ( a / c = 1.005), M S is smaller (1.5 μ B /Co), and the resistivity is 1 order of magnitude higher compared to SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 on the LSAT substrate. The strain effect may alter Co–O/Co–F bond lengths or cause octahedral distortion, influencing physical properties, as observed in La 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3 thin films. , Reflecting the metallic character, the thermopower ( S ) at room temperature (RT) for SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 /STO of +8 μV K –1 (Figure b) is reduced from +254 μV K –1 in semiconducting SrCoO 2.5 /STO films and is close to those of metallic SrCoO 3−δ films ( S = +9.6 μV K –1 for SrCoO 3−δ /STO) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 on the STO substrate with tensile strain ( a / c = 1.020) also exhibited ferromagnetism and metallic conductivity, but its T C is lower (∼90 K) than the nearly unstrained SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 /LSAT ( a / c = 1.005), M S is smaller (1.5 μ B /Co), and the resistivity is 1 order of magnitude higher compared to SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 on the LSAT substrate. The strain effect may alter Co–O/Co–F bond lengths or cause octahedral distortion, influencing physical properties, as observed in La 0.5 Sr 0.5 CoO 3 thin films. , Reflecting the metallic character, the thermopower ( S ) at room temperature (RT) for SrCoO 2.5 F 0.5 /STO of +8 μV K –1 (Figure b) is reduced from +254 μV K –1 in semiconducting SrCoO 2.5 /STO films and is close to those of metallic SrCoO 3−δ films ( S = +9.6 μV K –1 for SrCoO 3−δ /STO) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Magnetic nanomaterials received much attention from both basic and applied points due to interesting physical phenomena caused by the size effect [1,2]. In particular, soft magnetic materials are promising for spintronic applications including information storage, logic devices, and high-frequency electronics [3][4][5]. Various magnetic textures (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystalline orientations of LSC and TMD/LSC were further investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Figure f and Figure S5). The diffraction pattern of LSC exhibited a pure cubic-phase perovskite structure in the Pm 3̅ m space group . LSC grown on TMDs (MoS 2 , ReS 2 , and MoReS 2 ) showed additional diffraction peaks related to impurity oxides (e.g., La 3 ReO 8 or SrMoO 4 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%