1990
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80066-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate isomerization inhibits ribulosebisphospate carboxylase‐oxygenase during catalysis

Abstract: The inhibition of purified spinach ribulo~bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase which occurs progressively during catalysis in vitro is caused by accumulation of at least two tight-binding inhibitors at the catalytic site. Reduction of these inhibitors with NaB3H,, followed by dephosphorylation, produced a mixture of xylitol and arabinitol, thus identifying one of them as D-xylulose 1,Sbisphosphate. It was formed during carboxylation, presumably by a stereochemically incorrect reprotonation of the 2,3-enediolate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the spinach enzyme, this might be a result of inhibition caused by accumulating misprotonation by-products. Indeed, the kinetics of the decline for the spinach enzyme appeared quite reminiscent of the decline usually seen during catalysis which has been attributed to that cause (7)(8)(9)(10). Synechococcus Rubisco, however, is not subject to progressive inactivation during catalysis, at least at CO 2 saturation (16), and it showed a more pronounced decline such that, after 15-20 min, the rate of absorbance increase had fallen to approach the basal rate seen in the enzyme-free control.…”
Section: Conditions Leading To Exhaustion Of Gaseous Substrates-un-mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the spinach enzyme, this might be a result of inhibition caused by accumulating misprotonation by-products. Indeed, the kinetics of the decline for the spinach enzyme appeared quite reminiscent of the decline usually seen during catalysis which has been attributed to that cause (7)(8)(9)(10). Synechococcus Rubisco, however, is not subject to progressive inactivation during catalysis, at least at CO 2 saturation (16), and it showed a more pronounced decline such that, after 15-20 min, the rate of absorbance increase had fallen to approach the basal rate seen in the enzyme-free control.…”
Section: Conditions Leading To Exhaustion Of Gaseous Substrates-un-mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Either spinach Rubisco has a larger fraction of its active sites occupied by the enediol under these conditions, as speculated by Morell et al (16), or it stabilizes or retains the enediol less effectively than Synechococcus Rubisco. An idea of the scale of deoxypentodiulose-P production can be obtained by comparing the amounts observed with those of xylulose-P 2 , previously shown to be produced by spinach Rubisco once in every 400 catalytic turnovers while a constant supply of CO 2 was maintained (10). In the present experiments, spinach Rubisco produced approximately two-thirds as much deoxypentodiulose-P as xylulose-P 2 , whereas for the Synechococcus enzyme the ratio was approximately one-fifth (Table II).…”
Section: ␤ Elimination Of the Enediol Intermediate Occurs Even Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A curious difference between the Synechococcus and the spinach enzymes is that the latter displays "fallover" (7), the gradual loss of activity with time accompanied by production of XuBP in vitro. This phenomenon has not been detected in the Synechococcus enzyme (10). Given the very high degree of structural similarity of the XuBP complexes from spinach and Synechococcus (r.m.s.…”
Section: Xubp Binds As a Diol In The Active Site Of Spinach Rubisco-mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Rubisco also catalyzes the epimerization of RuBP via the enediolate to xylulose 1,5-bisphosphate (XuBP, compound VII) as a result of incorrect stereochemical reprotonation of the enediol at C-3 (6 -9). If misprotonation is instead directed at C-2, 3-ketoarabinitol 1,5-bisphosphate (compound VIII) or 3-ketoribitol 1,5-bisphosphate may be produced (10,11). The epimerization products are all potent inhibitors of Rubisco.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…regulators, such as RuBP (Jordan and Chollet, 1983), CAlP (Vu et al, 1984;Seemann et al, 1985;Servaites, 1990), and some by-products of the RuBP carboxylation reaction (Edmondson et al, 1990;Zhu and Jensen, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%