2006
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate mapping vs. tachycardia mapping using CARTO in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia: impact on outcome of catheter ablation

Abstract: When using a CARTO-guided approach for VT ablation in patients with coronary artery disease, the freedom from any ventricular arrhythmia is high (75%), but leaves the patient at a 23% risk of developing fast VT/VF during follow-up. Mapping during sinus rhythm or pacing is as successful as mapping during VT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously demonstrated that the spatial location of ventricular HFLPs might be correlated with intracardiac fragmented activity in patients with sustained VT. 9) Volkmer, et al have reported an overall success rate with VT ablation using 3D electro-anatomical mapping (CARTO) in 47 patients, with a subgroup analysis comparing VT mapping performed during sinus rhythm or pacing (substrate mapping). 23) In the present study, we have demonstrated that a synthesized 187-ch SAVP-ECG can detect the spatial distribution of HFLPs and ventricular depolarization. Interestingly, the spatial distribution of HFLP in cases with ARVC is in agreement with an increased RT dispersion that suggests a right ventricular outflow region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We have previously demonstrated that the spatial location of ventricular HFLPs might be correlated with intracardiac fragmented activity in patients with sustained VT. 9) Volkmer, et al have reported an overall success rate with VT ablation using 3D electro-anatomical mapping (CARTO) in 47 patients, with a subgroup analysis comparing VT mapping performed during sinus rhythm or pacing (substrate mapping). 23) In the present study, we have demonstrated that a synthesized 187-ch SAVP-ECG can detect the spatial distribution of HFLPs and ventricular depolarization. Interestingly, the spatial distribution of HFLP in cases with ARVC is in agreement with an increased RT dispersion that suggests a right ventricular outflow region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although the percentage of patients with recurrences varied between 17% and 36% in these studies, a considerable reduction in the frequency of ICD interventions was observed post-ablation. In a single center non-randomized study [43] , substrate mapping during sinus rhythm and activation mapping during VT was compared in patients with coronary artery disease. The results of the two strategies in term of clinical outcome were similar: success rate during follow-up was 80% and 71% for the activation and the substrate mapping groups, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endpoint for linear ablation was the completion of the designed lines. Acute success was defined as the achievement of the ablation endpoint, but allowed for the induction of non-clinical hemodynamically unstable VTs or ventricular fibrillation (VF) [6]. In both groups, chronic success during the follow-up period was defined as the absence of any sustained VT, VF, or ICD therapy.…”
Section: Mapping and Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%