1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00015000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate selection and seasonal variation in densities of invertebrates in stream pools of a tropical river

Abstract: Spatial distribution and seasonal variation in densities of the invertebrates were investigated for a year in three stream pools of a South Indian river. The effects of season, substrate type and water depth on the distribution were analyzed. Substrate type and season influenced the invertebrate distribution the most. Leaf packs harboured most of the organisms followed by macro-algal substrate and sand. The lowest densities were observed on rocky substrates and in the water column. Rocky substrates in shallow … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have indeed confirmed the prominent role of detritus in the distribution, and density of invertebrates. ARUNACHALAM et al, (1991) reported higher densities of invertebrates in leaf packs and in shallow areas of a river. In a manipulative experiment with baskets containing sediments differing in heterogeneity and detritus content, WILLIAMS, (1980) showed that higher biomass and numbers of invertebrates were attained in treatments with more detritus, independently of substratum heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors have indeed confirmed the prominent role of detritus in the distribution, and density of invertebrates. ARUNACHALAM et al, (1991) reported higher densities of invertebrates in leaf packs and in shallow areas of a river. In a manipulative experiment with baskets containing sediments differing in heterogeneity and detritus content, WILLIAMS, (1980) showed that higher biomass and numbers of invertebrates were attained in treatments with more detritus, independently of substratum heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These conditions are likely to change at a scale of only a few metres or centimetres. At this small scale, factors indicated as regulating macroinvertebrate distribution and richness are current velocity, substratum particle size (MARCHANT et al, 1985;WILLIAMS and MOORE, 1986;ARUNACHALAM et al, 1991), substratum stability (MALMQVIST and OTTO, 1987), organic matter in the substratum (WILLIAMS and MOORE, 1986), the spatial heterogeneity of the habitat (DOWNES et al 1995) and sediment grain size and heterogeneity (WILLIAMS, 1980;GAYRAUD and PHILIPPE, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arunachalam et al (1991) and Flecker & Feifarek (1994), working in India and in Andean rivers respectively, have found distinct temporal variations in the abundance of aquatic invertebrate assemblages between dry and rainy periods, with great reduction in the abundance of invertebrates during periods of increased rainfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the seasonal effects on macroinvertebrate community composition are important, should not be neglected and should be taken into account for biomonitoring purposes [13,14]. In tropical, temperate and subarctic river or stream systems, seasonal variations in macroinvertebrate assemblages have been observed and well documented [8,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, most of these investigations were confined to streams or rivers in temperate and tropical areas, and subtropical rivers on the regional scale have received much less attention [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%