“…It is plausible to think of the chaperone potential of spectrin fragments to be driven by the presence of surface exposed hydrophobic patches, as is the case with many chaperones (Reddy, Kumar, & Kumar, ; Xu et al, ), for example the chaperones such as sHSPs and GroEL also act with the help of exposed hydrophobic patches (Haslbeck, ; Lin, Schwartz, & Eisenstein, ). It is known that chaperones act by recognizing the exposed hydrophobic clusters in structurally perturbed, misfolded, partially folded or stressed proteins with the help of hydrophobic patches of their own (Bose & Chakrabarti, ). As we have confirmed the presence of hydrophobic patches on all the spectrin domains and have determined that they all have about the same hydrophobicity it is reasonable to think that they are the determining factor in chaperone activity.…”