2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substratum influences uptake of radium-226 by plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4 ). This value is consistent with the mean EC Ra value for soils 60 , 61 (≈ 7 Bq kg −1 ; n = 2070). EC Ra values for volcanic rocks from samples collected inside and around the Furnas caldera, i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…S4 ). This value is consistent with the mean EC Ra value for soils 60 , 61 (≈ 7 Bq kg −1 ; n = 2070). EC Ra values for volcanic rocks from samples collected inside and around the Furnas caldera, i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Radium is ubiquitous in the environment and can be found in water, rock, soil and vegetation. 226 Ra is a member of the uranium-238 decay series and is an alpha emitter with a half-life of 1600 ± 7 years [ 51 ]. The typical world value for the activity concentration of 226 Ra in soil is given as 35 Bq/kg [ 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When com par ing ura nium plant-soil con cen tra tion ra tios be tween sites un con tam inated and con tam i nated by ura nium, some dif fer ences for the de cid u ous trees and shrubs leaves were ob served, but were not sig nif i cantly dif fer ent ei ther [5]. Ranges of 226 Ra TF val ues, from the pres ent study, of 0.0026-0.44 at the af fected site and 0.068-0.111 at the back ground site, could be com pared with that ob tained for the tree leaves (Quercus robur, Castanea sativa, Tilia ×europaea, Quercus ilex) col lected ex clu sively at the back ground sites: 0.071-0.231 of gra nitic and meta morphic or i gin and 0.0022-0.137 of cal car e ous and sed i mentary or i gin at sites char ac ter ized as not con tam i nated sandy soils [25].…”
Section: Transfer Factor Vs Soil Ac Tiv Ity Con Cen Tra Tionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Op po sitely, in the deeper soil layer with the decrease of coarse soil par ti cles, 222 Rn at oms stayed blocked in the smaller pore spaces of soil which resulted in lower 210 Pb ac tiv ity con cen tra tion in the soil. In the study of Girault et al [25] (and ref er ences therein), there were no sig nif i cant sys tem atic dif ferences of the 222 Rn em a na tion co ef fi cients for soils between dif fer ent soil types (clay, silt, sand, gravel and till) (mean var ied from 0.17 to 0.24) and es pe cially between sands (with a mean 0.242) and even be tween plants that in cluded leaves of mul ti ple broadleaf tree spe cies (range of vari a tion 0.82-0.95). This could lead to the con clu sion that small 210 Pb ac tiv ity con cen tra tion dif fer ences can be ex pected in the leaves of av er age broadleaf trees (if not known to be hyperaccumulator or ex cluder spe cies) grown in soils of dif fer ent tex tures.…”
Section: Ac Tiv Ity Con Cen Tra Tion In Leaves Vs Soil Pa Ram E Tersmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation