2013
DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.16.2.365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substructural Method for Vibration Analysis of the Elastically Connected Double-Beam System

Abstract: Free and forced vibration analyses of the two parallel beams connected to each other by the uniformly distributed vertical springs have been conducted in this contribution. The coupled motion equations were derived by using the free interface substructural method, and both of the free vibration characteristics and the forced vibration responses of the complex double-beam system were obtained. The mode localization and frequency loci veering phenomena would take place in such weakly coupled double beam system w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boundary conditions of system contained two parallel beams specified by four letters, where first and second letters referred to left and right supports of upper beam, respectively, and third and fourth letters referred to left and right supports of lower beam, respectively. In order to validate results of this study, comparison between results obtained by DTM and other solutions (Huang and Liu, 2013;Oniszczuk, 2000) in the case of two parallel beams joined by uniform Winkler-type elastic layer has been done in Table 3 for the first 6 frequencies and different boundary conditions. Comparison of results indicates very good agreement and confirmed reliability of the DTM for vibration analysis of two parallel beams.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boundary conditions of system contained two parallel beams specified by four letters, where first and second letters referred to left and right supports of upper beam, respectively, and third and fourth letters referred to left and right supports of lower beam, respectively. In order to validate results of this study, comparison between results obtained by DTM and other solutions (Huang and Liu, 2013;Oniszczuk, 2000) in the case of two parallel beams joined by uniform Winkler-type elastic layer has been done in Table 3 for the first 6 frequencies and different boundary conditions. Comparison of results indicates very good agreement and confirmed reliability of the DTM for vibration analysis of two parallel beams.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed technique is capable of describing the rate-dependent behavior of viscoelastic materials; also, results show faster convergence of the proposed technique rather than a classical finite element method. Huang and Liu (2013) analyzed free and forced vibration of a doublebeam system using a substructural method. In this study, the forced vibration responses were obtained from Newmark direct integration, and the effects of local damages on dynamic response were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element solution using conventional two node elements has been developed to approve accuracy of DTM. In this way, each beam discritized by 100 elements and mass and stiffness matrices calculated as same as Huang and Liu 9 except the elastic layer matrix due to discontinuity. Results show accuracy and rapid convergence of DTM.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed technique is capable to describe rate-dependent behavior of viscoelastic materials; furthermore, results show faster convergence of the proposed technique rather than a classical finite element method. Huang and Liu 9 analyzed free and forced vibration of a double beam system by using a substructural method. In this study, the forced vibration responses were obtained from Newmark direct integration and the effects of local damages on dynamic response were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying energy criterion in Eq. 15, the dominant POM of the structure before and after damage occurrence is determined, and the following damage indicator is used: P OM(i) = P OM u (i) P OM d (i); i = 1; 2; :::; M; (16) where P OM u (i) is the dominant proper orthogonal mode before a damage or undamaged case at the ith measurement point, and P OM d (i) is the dominant proper orthogonal mode after damage at the same point. Damage location is revealed by an abrupt change in the graph of P OM.…”
Section: The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (Pod)mentioning
confidence: 99%