2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface and outcrop characterization of large tidally influenced point bars of the Cretaceous McMurray Formation (Alberta, Canada)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
135
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
135
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…point bars. Musial et al (2011) describe a meander loop width ranging between 4 and 8 km, with a point bar thickness of 30 m. The point bars of the Scalby Fm. are much smaller: their width is estimated between 500 m and 1 km and their thicknesses are less than 10 m. Consequently, the size of the heterogeneities is overall greater in the Mc Murray point bar deposits than in the Scalby Fm.…”
Section: Analogy With Subsurface MC Murray Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…point bars. Musial et al (2011) describe a meander loop width ranging between 4 and 8 km, with a point bar thickness of 30 m. The point bars of the Scalby Fm. are much smaller: their width is estimated between 500 m and 1 km and their thicknesses are less than 10 m. Consequently, the size of the heterogeneities is overall greater in the Mc Murray point bar deposits than in the Scalby Fm.…”
Section: Analogy With Subsurface MC Murray Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incised valley model (Hein et al 2001;Hein and Langenberg 2003;AEUB 2003) interprets the existence of tens-of-metres thick sand trends as accumulations that filled deeply incised channels formed as response to several or more 20-50 m sea-level falls followed by rapid rises. Alternatively, the parasequence model (Ranger andGingras 2001, 2006;Musial et al 2012) interprets the middle and upper McMurray strata as a succession of parasequences that prograded northward across a relatively stable, low-relief coastal plain with only relatively minor fluctuations in the overall rising sea level. These models also differ on the existence or non-existence of a major stratigraphic boundary between the middle and upper McMurray intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of a reservoir seepage field should not only reflect the characteristics of water flooding percolation in various stages but also take into account the evaluations of the history and present situation (Musial et al 2012). The main idea of this study is to consider the historical reservoir evaluation index, determine the ineffective water circulation area, the non-producing reserves area, high flow and low flow strength area; considering the present reservoir evaluation index to determine the critical flow velocity.…”
Section: Study On Evaluation Methods Of Reservoir Seepage Field In Higmentioning
confidence: 99%