2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface characterization of a construction site in Nanjing, China using ERT and CPTU methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, with the processive development of new directions and demands in geotechnical engineering, especially marine geotechnical engineering, many international research institutions (e.g., University of British Columbia, Georgia Institute of Technology, Delft University, and Southeast University) and professional in situ test instrument development companies (e.g., Hogentogler, Vertek, ConeTec, and Furgo Corporation) have developed new sensors for CPTU. These new CPTU sensors promote the CPTU test method to develop in the direction of multi-functionality [10,[19][20][21][22][23][24], which further broadens the application field of the CPTU. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the internal structure of a common CPTU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with the processive development of new directions and demands in geotechnical engineering, especially marine geotechnical engineering, many international research institutions (e.g., University of British Columbia, Georgia Institute of Technology, Delft University, and Southeast University) and professional in situ test instrument development companies (e.g., Hogentogler, Vertek, ConeTec, and Furgo Corporation) have developed new sensors for CPTU. These new CPTU sensors promote the CPTU test method to develop in the direction of multi-functionality [10,[19][20][21][22][23][24], which further broadens the application field of the CPTU. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the internal structure of a common CPTU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the traditional SPT, CPTUs have significant advantages, such as providing continuous testing data and suitability for more complex environmental conditions; as a result, they are extensively utilized in marine geotechnical surveys. However, existing empirical formulae relating CPTU results to soil parameters are primarily based on terrestrial environments [7,8] and are unsuitable for marine conditions [9]. Therefore, it is of great importance to conduct in-depth research on the empirical formulae connecting CPTU results and marine soil parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A borehole coring permeability coefficient test is still the most commonly used testing method to determine permeability [27,28]. However, excavation and core drilling cause man-made damage to the wall, and increasingly less non-destructive testing methods are also used in the detection of wall quality [29][30][31][32]. Modoni et al [33] analyzed the quality of jet grouting with single-fluid and double-fluid jet grouting, and different grouting components and injection parameters through the indoor test of sample coring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%