2009
DOI: 10.1364/oe.17.020448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface damage measurement of ground fused silica parts by HF etching techniques

Abstract: Detection and measurement of subsurface damage of ground optical surfaces are of major concern in the assessment of high damage thresholds fused silica optics for high power laser applications. We herein detail a new principle of SSD measurement based on the utilization of HF acid etching. We also review and compare different subsurface damage (SSD) characterization techniques applied to ground and fine ground fused silica samples. We demonstrate good concordance between the different measurements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent contributions mainly focus on a proportional relation between SSD depth and Rt, SSD depth ¼ k Rt, where k is a constant factor. We have shown in a previous work that part of the discrepancy of this proportional factor k, such as reported in the literature, was due to the various preparation methods and measuring principles retained for both surface roughness and SSD [12]. We evidenced a factor of k ¼ 9 for a set of diamond ground samples, in good concordance with results from Miller et al [19] and Suratwala et al [11].…”
Section: A Relationship Between Roughness and Ssd Depthsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Recent contributions mainly focus on a proportional relation between SSD depth and Rt, SSD depth ¼ k Rt, where k is a constant factor. We have shown in a previous work that part of the discrepancy of this proportional factor k, such as reported in the literature, was due to the various preparation methods and measuring principles retained for both surface roughness and SSD [12]. We evidenced a factor of k ¼ 9 for a set of diamond ground samples, in good concordance with results from Miller et al [19] and Suratwala et al [11].…”
Section: A Relationship Between Roughness and Ssd Depthsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Their measurements were made on both diamond ground silica samples and loose abrasive lapped samples. If we did confirm a proportionality factor close to 9 on diamond ground fused silica samples [12], current results show that this factor cannot be extended to loose abrasive lapped samples. It means that k is changing with the manufacturing process.…”
Section: A Relationship Between Roughness and Ssd Depthmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations