2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface Imaging of Cell Organelles by Force Microscopy

Abstract: The development of high-resolution, label-free, noninvasive, and subsurface microscopy methods of living cells remains a formidable problem. Force-microscopy-based stiffness measurements contribute to our understanding of single-cell nanomechanics. The elastic properties of the cell’s outer structures, such as the plasma membrane and actin cytoskeleton, dominate stiffness measurements, which in turns prevents the imaging of intracellular structures. We propose that the above limitation could be overcome by com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To tackle this point, we used an AFM-based vertical segmentation approach on living cells, which enables us to isolate the contribution of the PM from overall cell mechanics ( Figure 2g). [32,42,43] We first extracted FD curves from the nuclear region of MCF10 cells probed with a bare AFM tip. Next, we defined different fit ranges in the contact region of these FD curves to specifically extract PM and cell cortex elasticity (Figure 2g and the Experimental Section).…”
Section: Mechanical Phenotyping Of Human Mammary Epithelial Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this point, we used an AFM-based vertical segmentation approach on living cells, which enables us to isolate the contribution of the PM from overall cell mechanics ( Figure 2g). [32,42,43] We first extracted FD curves from the nuclear region of MCF10 cells probed with a bare AFM tip. Next, we defined different fit ranges in the contact region of these FD curves to specifically extract PM and cell cortex elasticity (Figure 2g and the Experimental Section).…”
Section: Mechanical Phenotyping Of Human Mammary Epithelial Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern AFM applications commonly involve testing samples that are soft, biological, or polymeric in nature. Understanding the dissipative nature of these materials at the nanoscale is especially important to their use in many applications [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Howev-er, performing such measurements using AFM has been difficult due to the complexity of material phenomena that govern AFM observables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrast by stiffness tomography was used to visualize and obtain mechanical feedback about mitochondria and Golgi apparatus without specific staining [53]. Rheological model was applied on stiffness tomography for fibroblast cells localizing actin bundle fibers under cell surface or nucleoli within nucleus structure from the contrast of different hydrodynamic drag [54]. This interesting approach can visualize mechanical properties of materials with different phases at micro-nano level even at ultralow stiffness [55], still the mathematical interpretation is ill-defined, in fact, the convolution of elastic response of different phases must be considered for a correct quantification [28].…”
Section: Contact Mechanics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actin stress fibres at cell periphery and nuclear region can be easily detected from topography. Mechanical features at subcellular level in heterogenous cells can be resolved and different mechanical properties can be distinguished and quantified [54]. For example, applying small forces, the surface structure of living kidney cells were observed evidencing microvilli consisting in plasma membrane-covered actin bundles stabilized by crosslinking proteins [112].…”
Section: High Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%